AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

ED Carvajal

PHL101 · PHIL101 · PHIL207 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Skip if you have options; his classes but chaotic and poorly run.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedInconsistentFunny but weak teachingTextbook testsGrading errors
  • Students split between calling him excellent and the .
  • Often unprepared, late with materials, and .
  • and a nice personality.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some say tests come straight from the book and the class feels easy, but late materials and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty ratings and comments range from easy textbook tests to hard chapters he skips teaching.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Multiple students explicitly say take someone else due to unprepared teaching and chaos.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Mixed signals; one student says correct answers were marked wrong and tests varied in form.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not heavy overall, but forgotten posts and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Personality is often liked, yet many call him unprepared, forgetful, and weak at teaching hard chapters.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Students mainly describe tests and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call him funny and easy with textbook tests, many report unprepared lectures, late materials, and .

Main concern

Unprepared teaching and .

What students said

“The . Cool guy, but seriously sucks at his job.”
PHIL207
“Very funny guy! . Shows up late occassionaly, tests are questions right out of text book. Overall Easy!”
PHIL101
“ . Was not prepaired for the tests.”
PHIL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests sometimes come from the book and shift between multiple choice, essay, and .

Textbook questionsMixed formatsNo study guides

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but inconsistent in format, with no reliable study guides.

Textbook questionsMultiple choiceEssayTrue false
“ . Overall Easy!”
PHIL101
“Did not give study guides for the test. .”
PHIL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The . Cool guy, but seriously sucks at his job.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2012, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He , and gave up on trying to teach 2 chapters towards the end.”

👍 Recommendation Split

35/100

“ if you can.”

📝

62/100

“ . Overall Easy!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • generally unprepared
  • Went over the easy parts, and left the rest to us
  • He is a very excellent teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Overall Easy!
  • sometimes he marked correct answers wrong

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Cool guy
  • Very funny guy! Super nice
  • good guy though

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

and polarized views, so confidence is only moderate.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1012 reviews
PHIL2072 reviews
PHL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values