AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Denise Stiglich

CHEM201 · CHEM101 · CHEM100 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless and and hard free-response tests.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard tests no study guideUnapproachableSpeeds through lecturesStrict lab latenessHigh dropout
  • Most students say lectures and and help is hard to get
  • failure or dropout risk
  • One transfer student praises thorough theory teaching as preparation for a 4-year school

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Students say perfect grades are near impossible and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Chemistry content plus fast lectures and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and even one minute late can force a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most reviews urge avoidance due to teaching gaps, attitude, and harsh labs.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Hard non-multiple-choice tests and little guidance make high grades rare.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Difficult tests, self-teaching load, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Majority say she is unapproachable and unclear; a minority praises thorough theory.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Hard written tests dominate student .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person chem with fast lectures, hard non-multiple-choice tests, attitude complaints, and .

Main concern

Going into tests blind and .

What students said

“She does not teach you what is on the ! .”
CHEM101
“if you're late on a class for the semester or you fail”
CHEM100
“her thorough teaching carried me a long way. I got a B in her class.”
CHEM201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as super hard, never multiple choice, with no study guides.

Never multiple choiceNo study guideHard free-response tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

study guides; students feel unprepared.

Never multiple choiceNo study guideHard tests
“She does not teach you what is on the ! .She never gives a study guide.”
CHEM101
“Gives her own tests that are NEVER multiple choice, which is difficult in Chemistry.”
CHEM100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . if you plan to teach yourself the entire semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 and attitude themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“she does not explain things well, ”

🚫 Recommendation

24/100

“ !”

🧪 Lab Strictness

12/100

“if you're late on a class for the semester or you fail”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is not very approchable
  • comes to class with attitudes and
  • She taught theory with clarity and demonstrated with problem solving

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is impossible to get a perfect grade
  • Class dropped from 40 to 10

Theme 3

🧪

  • if you're late on a class
  • I got dropped 4 weeks in, !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Six older reviews with consistent negative themes and one strong positive outlier; limited grade data.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1004 reviews
CHEM1011 review
CHEM2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values