AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

C Reardon

MATH · MATH5 · CALCULUSI · MATH105 · MATH103105 · MATH26B · MATH90 · MATH50 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and practice tests, but be ready for uneven classroom clarity.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing Math ProfDrops Lowest ScoresPractice Tests HelpVery HelpfulConfusing at Board
  • Many students love , and .
  • A strong minority say she confuses herself at the board and is not classroom-ready.
  • if and practice tests aggressively.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Dropped scores, practice finals, and than the content alone suggests.

, though some comments describe online sections.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Homework load exists, but practice tests and .

Difficulty comments mix online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; one student was even allowed to leave early daily.

and comes from in-person-tagged reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and grading; others call classroom teaching a disaster.

Recommendation split appears across the in-person-tagged review set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students cite dropped homework and tests, practice finals, and .

Format shift

Based on in-person-tagged reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, but .

Format shift

Based on in-person-tagged reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Supportive and patient for many students, yet repeatedly criticized for board mistakes and confusion.

Format shift

Based on in-person-tagged reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and a practice-supported final all matter.

Format shift

Based on in-person-tagged reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Reviews labeled in-person still span online and face-to-face math; students and .

Main concern

Some students and they leave unprepared for later calculus.

What students said

“She excused the lowest 5 homework assignments and .”
MATH90
“She allows and notecards for every test.”
MATH103105
“Mrs. Reardon is always making mistakes at the board.”
MATH26B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are , and score drops.

Practice finalMultiple test attemptsNotecards allowedDrops lowest scores

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report , and dropped low scores.

Practice final2 attempts per testNotecards and calculatorsDrops lowest homework and tests
“Final = 4 hrs, one try, ended up being easy ( .)”
MATH105
“She excused the lowest 5 homework assignments and .”
MATH90
“She allows and notecards for every test.”
MATH103105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She excused the lowest 5 homework assignments and . The !”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 and polarized teaching skill. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Ms. Reardon is a wonderful teacher. She works hard to make sure that all students understand that material.”

⚖️

82/100

“ and .”

⚠️ Classroom Confusion

30/100

“she confuses herself at the board”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character & Help

  • and is a very sweet person
  • You couldn't ask for a more patient professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and
  • Easy tests
  • allows and notecards for every test

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Clarity

  • always making mistakes at the board
  • she doesn't know what the heck she's doing
  • She is a total disaster in the classroom

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews from 2003-2010 with rich detail and a .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 57
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1056 reviews
MATH3 reviews
MATH903 reviews
MATH26B2 reviews
MATH502 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CALCULUSI1 review
MATH1031051 review
MATH51 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values