AI Rate Professor

Biology

Peter Devries

BIO107 · BIO104 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

; students report poor teaching, little help, and a high chance of failing.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWorst Bio TeacherUnhelpful AnswersUnprepared LecturesHigh Fail RiskAvoid Completely
  • Every review is low quality with difficulty ratings mostly at 5.
  • Students say and .
  • Multiple warnings not to take him for human biology or BIO107.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students repeatedly say you will not pass and that he does not care about pass or fail outcomes.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Difficulty ratings cluster at 4 to 5 with comments that lectures and labs leave students lost.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every substantive and calls him among the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students feel he does not care about pass rates and that success is unlikely without self-teaching.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

High difficulty and repeated failing risk imply a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

14/100

Students say he is unprepared, cannot teach, and answers questions poorly or not at all.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews focus on lecture and split.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person bio students consistently report unprepared teaching, confusing answers, and a .

Main concern

You may not pass even if the subject is interesting, because explanations and help are weak.

What students said

“The ! I don't recommened him to anybody.”
BIO107
“ pass his class.”
BIO104
“If you do ask, he .”
BIO107

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but consistently signal high stakes and low support for passing.

High fail riskIn-person bio courses

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students mainly warn they will not pass.

High fail riskIn-person bio courses
“ pass his class.”
BIO104
“FELT AS IF HE WASN'T PREPARED AND DDIN'T REALLY CARE ABOUT THE STUDENTS PASS/FAIL RATE”
BIO107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher was one of the life! He did not explain anything when you asked him questions... Do not take him for human biology you will not pass his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching failure, unhelpful answers, and fail risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

14/100

“he does not have the gift of teaching!”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“I don't recommened him to anybody.”

❓ Question Help

15/100

“If you do ask, he .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are o.k. if you read your book and don't ask any questions.
  • FELT AS IF HE WASN'T PREPARED
  • he does not have the gift of teaching!

Theme 2

❓ About Getting Help

  • He rarely ever answers any questions
  • don't ask questions in Lab because he doesn't know and will say so.
  • he kinda beats around the bush, and doesn't really answer it

Theme 3

🚫 About Outcomes

  • you will not pass his class.
  • I don't recommened him to anybody.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six highly consistent negative reviews from 2008 to 2009 provide clear directional signal despite older dates.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BIO1075 reviews
BIO1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values