Neil Quebbemann

CHEM066 · CHEM101 · CHEM102 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 72/100
RMP rating: 3.9/5
Take again: 76.09%
Difficulty: 2.9

The decision

if you want structured chem and will put in weekly work; skip if you need constant hand-holding or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHighly organized CanvasClear recorded lecturesHeavy homeworkFair exams if you practiceHit-or-miss approachability

Many students praise organized , and strong office hours.
A vocal minority report , and condescending tone.
watch lectures, do all practice, and use office hours.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with and lecture study, but chemistry workload and tough weeks mean an A is earned, not free.

Both formats say put in the work for the grade; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Chem content stays moderately hard, though and practice make it more approachable than average horror-story chem.

Online and but clearer under his structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and lateness can annoy him.

and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Roughly three in and fair testing, tempered by workload and personality complaints.

Positive recommendation tone appears in both formats, with and some in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Partial credit and , but some call him a tough grader with limited .

Format shift

Online partial-credit praise contrasts with .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and Cengage work make the load heavy, especially in compressed terms.

Format shift

Both formats stress lots of homework; summer in-person is called practically inhumane by one student.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Clear organized lectures and of sarcasm, dull energy, or unresponsiveness.

Format shift

Online praise for ; in-person reviews split more on personality.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and finals, with exams often mirroring practice sets.

Format shift

as central.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person and hybrid lab students mostly like structure, humor, and and approachability.

Main concern

Summer pace and ; a minority call him unhelpful.

What students said

“ and well structured class. Good at teaching but can be rude/condescending.”
Chem101

“The and review stuff, and the final was pretty much the same as the midterms.”
Chem101

“This professor gave a crazy amount of hw like full time job, 40 assignments per week.”
Chem101

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and hybrid , and fair tests, but some report unresponsiveness and heavy work.

Main concern

and uneven email responsiveness frustrate some online students.

What students said

“ ! I thought chemistry would be hard, but he made it make sense.”
Chem101

“ . and is annoyed when you try to approach him.”
Chem101

“He made hard stuff like chemistry way easier to understand. and always willing to help if you're stuck.”
CHEM102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally fair and aligned with homework and lecture practice, though some students still find them tough.

Exams match homework and reviewsPartial credit for work shownWeekly quizzesHybrid lecture videosNo strong proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and hybrid students report exams look like homework, worksheets, and and weekly quizzes.

Exams from homework and reviewFinals similar to midtermsWeekly quizzesExtra credit labs sometimes

“The and review stuff, and the final was pretty much the same as the midterms.”
Chem101

“No surprises on the worksheets.”
Chem101

“He gives partial exam credit for wrong answers with correct procedure.”
Chem101

Online

Online students mostly say exams and quizzes are fair if you practice lectures and homework; .

Fair testsHomework and lecture alignedWeekly quizzesPartial credit

“His notes and , and the .”
Chem101

“if you pay attention to the trickier versions of questions he will give you partial credit even if the answer isn't correct”
Chem101

“ and .”
Chem101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ and well structured class. Good at teaching but can be rude/condescending.”
Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting organization, workload, and mixed approachability. Credibility rating: High.

🗂️ Organization

88/100

“Prof Q is honestly one of the most orginized professors I've had in a while. it way easier to keep up.”

📚 Workload

30/100

“This professor gave a crazy amount of hw like full time job, 40 assignments per week.”

🎯 Teaching Clarity

74/100

“ ! I thought chemistry would be hard, but he made it make sense.”

⚠️ Approachability Split

40/100

“He is unapproachable, lacks empathy, and comes off as condescending.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Lectures were recorded and
His lectures are top notch, he explains everything you need to know in detail
He makes Chem fun with his quirky and fun personality.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

If you put in the work (watch all lectures + .
You put in the work and you will get the grade you deserve.
and there are no surprises.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

.
Office hours are very helpfull!
don't hesitate to approach him.He has a great sense of humor once you get to know him!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-six reviews across Chem 66, 101, and 102 show repeated themes on organization, workload, and mixed personality with good detail.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528

4 out of 57

3 out of 50

2 out of 52

1 out of 59

Course coverage

Chem10128 reviews

chem06612 reviews

CHEM1026 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 3 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

B+ 2 · B 11

C range

C+ 2 · C 4

D range

D+ 1

F

F 1

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2

Neil Quebbemann

x x if you want structured chem and will put in weekly work; skip if you need constant hand-holding or x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Standard

Mandatory

WorthIt

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🗂️ Organization

📚 Workload

🎯 Teaching Clarity

⚠️ Approachability Split

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

📬 About Communication

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want structured chem and will put in weekly work; skip if you need constant hand-holding or .