AI Rate Professor

English

Rachelle Okawa

ENGLISH101 · ENGW986 · ENG102 · COS1000ENG101 · ENG101 · ENGLISH28 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
35.71%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Only take if and ; many recent students say avoid.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHeavy Paper LoadUnclear InstructionsHelpful Feedback When It WorksPolarized by Format
  • Older and skill growth
  • Recent online and and harsh grades
  • Expect , and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and multiple D/C grades show an A needs heavy revision work and still may not come.

Online recent reviews report very low grades; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

ENG101 is made harder , and picky standards.

and papers; online complaints are louder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most recent reviews mark attendance mandatory, especially online sections.

Online ; a few older notes allow more flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Take-again rate near 36% and a flood of .

; recent online reviews largely do not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or .

Format shift

Online reports D grades and impossible standards; in person still labels her tough but fair for some.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

So , and multi-essay short terms.

Format shift

Both formats pile on papers; online short .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Caring, feedback-rich teaching for admirers contrasts with unorganized and .

Format shift

In-person historical reviews score higher; recent online quality is mostly 1s.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and homework; and secondary.

Format shift

Online notes tests worth about 5 points; papers dominate both formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person is more mixed-to-positive historically: caring lectures and writing growth for and .

Main concern

Harsh or and .

What students said

“ !! She really builds your writing skills”
ENGLISH101
“She is a , but I promise you will be a better writer when you finish her class.”
1000
“This is the worst English 101 class I have ever taken in my entire life. The ”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ENG101 is split: a , while most recent reviews call her unorganized, unclear, and nearly impossible for A/B grades.

Main concern

, and D-range outcomes despite hard work.

What students said

“I don't believe that anyone has ever gotten an A or a B in this class. This teacher makes things unnecessarily difficult for no reason at all.”
ENG101
“Getting an A is definitely achievable as long as !”
ENG101
“This teacher is completely unorganized in everything that .”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly essays and discussions; small tests exist but rarely drive the grade.

Paper HeavyLow-Point TestsWeekly Discussions

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, and final totaling limited pages; .

4 Papers Per SemesterMidterm and Final Essays
“You do not need to write anymore than 12 pages in her class (4 papers, midterm, final all total 12 pages)”
ENGLISH101

Online

Online students describe low-value tests and .

Low-Point TestsMultiple PapersWeekly Discussions
“ ; and barley effect your grade in a good way.”
ENG101
“I took an eight-week course which included a couple essays and a .”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the worst English 101 class I have ever taken in my entire life. The and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, contrasting older in-person praise with recent online complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

24/100

“Short-term class had 4 papers. It is also extremely important to read what she assigns!”

⚖️

26/100

“She is a , but she gives lots of ”

💔 Recent Frustration

20/100

“Even if you were to do your best it's still not good enough for this teacher.”

❤️ Caring Mentorship

70/100

“I absolutely love Professor Okawa. and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Feedback

  • She gives loads of .
  • and not helpful at all.
  • She pushed me. Love that she pushes her students to do better.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I don't believe that anyone has ever gotten an A or a B in this class.
  • Getting an A is definitely achievable as long as !
  • I felt I did not learn much and .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • Lots of homework
  • Assigns readings every class and only 4 papers per semester

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

21 detailed reviews with a and recent grades give medium-high confidence despite bipolar ratings.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG10110 reviews
ENGLISH1014 reviews
10002 reviews
ENGLISH282 reviews
COS1000ENG1011 review
Show 2 more courses
ENG1021 review
ENGW9861 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

3

D 2 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Rather not say 3