AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jaime Vallejo

127STATISTICS · MATH112 · MATH125 · STATS227 · STATS1 · STATSXL10 · MATH241 · MATH227 · MAT227S · MATH260 · MATH227S · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
75.68%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will follow his methods, use his notes, and grind exams; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear notesTest heavyTough graderExtra creditAmazing lectures
  • Lectures and and help many non-math students pass stats
  • Grading is picky about method and
  • and test corrections soften difficulty for students who stay engaged

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Passing is realistic with notes and corrections, but an A often needs exact methods, heavy practice, and .

Online reviews report harsher zeros and method penalties; and recovery.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Lectures make concepts graspable, but stats and and test-heavy.

; online test timing and hardness feel worse to several students.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance is often not strictly mandatory, but skipping hurts because notes and .

Online and not to skip.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and support, tempered by tough-grader complaints.

; recent online precalc or calc-adjacent sections are more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough on methods and partial credit; but .

Format shift

Online students more often report zeroing whole problems for non-preferred methods.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Regular homework and pure busywork chaos.

Format shift

Several online MATH260 and .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and real patience in class for students who ask questions.

Format shift

In-class teaching praised across formats; outside-class email and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Quizzes, midterms, and and some .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are largely positive on patience, real-life examples, notecards, and , with a minority calling exams tricky and .

Main concern

Tricky exams and picky method scoring still appear .

What students said

“If math isn't . He's really caring and understanding”
STATS1
“When u do the test corrections, sometimes would give either 1 to no points at all even if its right.”
STATS227

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many praise notes and homework, and tight test timing.

Main concern

and little outside-class support can tank scores online.

What students said

“He provide step by step instruction on how to do every problems.”
MATH227
“he will never NEVER increase your score even by one, gives INSANE amounts of ”
MATH260

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and often tricky; friendliness varies with , and whether methods are graded rigidly.

Test heavyTest correctionsNotecard allowedMethod-specific gradingTake-home exams (some sections)

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams can include notecards, study guides nearly matching tests, and .

Notecard on testsStudy guidesTake-home examsTough grader
“you can have a and ”
MATH227
“The class was .”
MATH260

Online

Online exams are frequently described as hard or time-pressured, with strict show-your-work and method rules; .

Hard examsShow all workMethod strictTest corrections
“This instructor isn't realistic on time restraints when ”
MATH227
“I was given a 0 on a test by this professor because I used a calculus technique”
MATH241

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If math isn't your subject, you should take professor Vallejo. He's really caring and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ while, his lectures werent boring to me bc they related to real life situations.”

⚖️

32/100

“ if you did it correctly unless its his way.”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“Anyone that it”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • and easy to follow
  • He is the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test heavy
  • exams are so tricky

Theme 3

🛠️ About Support Tools

  • lets you use a note card

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

42 reviews over many years with rich detail and recurring split between strong lectures and .

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH22721 reviews
MATH227S6 reviews
MATH2604 reviews
MAT227S2 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
Show 6 more courses
STATS2272 reviews
127STATISTICS1 review
MATH1121 review
MATH2411 review
STATS11 review
STATSXL101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 8 · A- 1

B range

17

B+ 4 · B 11 · B- 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2