AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Charles Daniel

ACCT1ONLINE · ACCTG1 · ACC001 · ACCT2 · ACCT001 · ACCTG002 · ACCTG001 · ACCT01 · ACCT1 · 73 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
70.59%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

if you want rigorous accounting practice and can self-manage a very heavy weekly load.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy Workload AccountingTough GraderPlatform-Heavy OnlinePolarizing RigorAnti-Cheat Serious
  • Motivated students credit real college-level accounting skill gains and tight structure.
  • Critics say he does not teach, relies on McGraw Hill automation, and .
  • Expect , and little sympathy for excuses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

As are possible but only with sustained hard weekly work; many call it no easy A and .

Both formats stress hard work; online has more A reports among those who keep up.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Accounting depth, pace, and students describe.

Difficulty ratings near 5 dominate online and in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and warn that skipping or falling behind tanks the grade.

Online still expects constant engagement; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About seven in ten would take again; while .

Online is more split-love; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

, and no-excuse culture leave little cushion for missed work.

Format shift

; online adds automated picky homework.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

, and exam weight create an overwhelming load.

Format shift

Overload language is strongest online; .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Split between masterful structured teaching and complaints that the course is self-taught software.

Format shift

Online has both glowing 5s and 1s; in-person leans more critical overall.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, but exams and proctored tests carry major grade risk.

Format shift

Online stresses proctored exams; and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some praise caring tough teaching, others call hybrid inflexible or say he is rude and outdated.

Main concern

Inflexible heavy hybrid format and .

What students said

“Go with the fully 100% online format.”
ACCT01
“ .”
ACCT2
“This professor is entitled & rude.”
ACCT1ONLINE

Remote format

Online

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online is structured and resource-rich for self-starters, but many call it self-taught McGraw Hill with intense daily work and .

Main concern

Workload volume and reports of minimal teaching or .

What students said

“Definitely earns his paycheck. Dr. Daniel class is structured, challenging, and designed to make you learn accounting, not just pass.”
ACCT001
“I honestly don't know what he gets paid for. He doesn't teach.”
ACCT001
“ AND HARD.”
ACCT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently described as proctored, anti-cheat protected, and genuinely hard.

Proctored ExamsAnti-Cheating SoftwareHard FinalsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize extremely hard finals and .

Extremely hard finalTest heavyNo makeup testsHomework and quizzes
“ .”
ACCT2
“No or . because he loves to confuse your mind.”
ACCT1

Online

Online students explicitly mention proctored exams and anti-cheating software protecting honest work.

Proctored examsAnti-cheating softwareHard examsHeavy weekly homework
“ AND HARD.”
ACCT1
“My work was protected with anti-cheating software that I liked”
ACCT1
“Anti-cheating software is used”
ACCT01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is a real work load class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (40 online, 10 in person), highlighting rigor, workload, and split opinions. Credibility rating: High.

🧱 College-Level Rigor

85/100

“This is a REAL college course with REAL work. Do not let that it is online fool you.”

🔥 Workload Overload

16/100

“If you're taking a full load this class will break you.”

💔 Polarized Teaching View

40/100

“There really isn't much to say; he didn't teach anything.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Daniel has a gift for making accounting click.
  • He doesn't teach. The class is structured through the online platform
  • and beyond to teach his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it is no easy A
  • I got the grade that I actually earned.

Theme 3

📚

  • There are
  • AND HARD.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

73

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with rich detail and stable themes of rigor, workload, and polarization make the pattern reliable.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ACCT112 reviews
ACCT00110 reviews
ACCT1ONLINE10 reviews
ACCT018 reviews
ACC0015 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ACCT22 reviews
ACCTG0011 review
ACCTG0021 review
ACCTG11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

25

A 22 · A- 3

B range

11

B+ 3 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1