AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Vanessa Schulz

PHILO001 · PHILOS101 · PHILOS020 · PHIL001 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless and and weak communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow gradingHeavy readingUnresponsive emailsTough graderCancels class
  • Students widely report unanswered emails and
  • Heavy weekly reading and
  • Only one glowing review; most advise taking philosophy with someone else

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some earn As with reading and quizzes, but , and .

Online ends with ; in-person can still yield As if you show up and self-manage.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and high expectations for intro philosophy make the content hard for beginners.

; online adds multi-page weekly packets and subjective quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and no in others, with in-person reliability problems on her side.

; in-person is more mandatory yet she sometimes does not show.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is about 14 percent and .

Both formats lean negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and large end-of-term papers that can crash an A.

Format shift

; in-person also reports tough expectations.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

4-6 , and sometimes group projects or long exams.

Format shift

Online reading volume is extreme; in-person adds lectures and many papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Knows the material but often unresponsive, unreliable about showing up, and slow to grade.

Format shift

arrives; online is almost all communication failures.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly quizzes and discussions plus papers and heavier exams or projects.

Format shift

Online mixes quizzes, discussions, and big papers; and paper heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

doors, cancelled rainy days, condescension, and unfinished grading.

Main concern

Reliability issues like no-shows, cancelled classes, and .

What students said

“showing up to class on time and seeing the door locks and lights off.”
PHILO001
“ finals week.”
PHILO001
“she cancelled class a number of times all because it was raining and she didn't wanna deal with the commute and traffic.”
PHILOS101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students , and grade drops from large finals or papers.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“she will not !”
PHILOS020
“Hasn't graded some of my assignments over 1 mo.”
PHILOS020
“I had an A throughout the course until the very end. The C.”
PHILOS020

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes may be retaken, but exams and and .

Weekly quizzes with retakesHeavy reading on examsFinal paper impactGroup projects

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lectures more than detailed exam formats; policies are not clearly proven.

PapersLecture based
“ finals week.”
PHILO001

Online

Weekly multi-choice quizzes are retakeable and show up on exams; ; .

Retakeable quizzesReading-heavy examsFinal paper
“ as many times as you'd like. They will be on the exams, so keep in mind.”
PHILOS020
“During finals, she had us read 65 pages of articles for .”
PHILOS020
“The C.”
PHILOS020

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting communication, grading delay, and workload themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📧 Communication Failures

15/100

“she will not !”

🐢

20/100

“Hasn't graded some of my assignments over 1 mo.”

📚

25/100

“You will be assigned 4-6 readings a week to help you complete the and quiz.”

👎 Low Recommendation

18/100

“ ”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Reliability

  • seeing the door locks and lights off
  • she cancelled class a number of times all because it was raining
  • and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The C.
  • Expects a lot out of a beginning philosophy class.
  • There's no either.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • She also assigns an unreasonable amount of reading material.
  • When printed, the readings are 5-10 pages.
  • long, heavy lectures

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 reviews but themes of unresponsiveness and and formats.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHILOS0203 reviews
PHILO0012 reviews
PHIL0011 review
PHILOS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2