AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Thomas Harjuno

MATH262 · MATH245 · MATH115 · MATH227 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you are strong in math, can attend fully, and want rigorous stats or calculus with fair but .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyHigh standardsMIT-style examsSkip class you fail
  • strong students
  • late policies and
  • Participation and his method matter;

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

As exist for engaged students, but , and no late work make an A high-effort and far from guaranteed.

; online is less forgiving on lateness for busy students.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Stats and advanced math are taught with and high difficulty ratings around 4-5.

Online and ; weaker students especially struggle online.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass; .

Both formats push presence and participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

excellent if strong and if weak in math or need flexibility.

Online has sharper split between love and drop; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and fair-but-hard scoring that punishes incomplete work and missed detail.

Format shift

Online and ; supporters still say fair if you follow his style.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Daily or heavy homework, lecture-heavy classes, and .

Format shift

and late rules hit hardest; .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some call lectures amazing with life lessons and ; others say notes are illegible and unhelpful.

Format shift

Positive teaching praise appears in both formats, but online failures are more intense.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

; homework helps practice but .

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy; tip.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews call him an excellent but and reward detailed work in his style.

Main concern

and USC/Harvard/MIT-level exams scare weaker math students.

What students said

“ , but hes great at his job.”
MATH245
“ USC, Harvard, and MIT. You heard right, so do yourself a favor and .”
MATH227
“Show up to class, pay attention, do the and you will pass the class.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

motivated students love supplemental videos and high standards, while others call lectures unhelpful and .

Main concern

Zero tolerance for late work and lectures that some .

What students said

“ and Harvard so being able to solve problems from prestigious universities feels amazing!”
MATH227
“the lectures he has are no help to the homework he gives out and the the exams”
MATH245
“dosent except any work even if its a minute late if you are not good in math or struggle with .”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

problems, and require his detailed show-your-work style.

MIT Harvard style examsTest heavyPrevious exams on websiteDetailed work required

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and MIT exams; grade hinges on detailed test work.

Elite university style examsTest heavyShow work in detail
“ USC, Harvard, and MIT.”
MATH227
“your . If you follow HIS STYLE and show your work in ”
1475
“ALWAYS look .”
MATH245

Online

Online tests feel extremely hard; some say homework and . .

Hard online examsHomework-exam mismatch reportsStrict deadlines
“ and Harvard”
MATH227
“the the exams”
MATH245
“stats is already hard he makes it 10 times harder”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you're not strong in math, I would advise against taking his courses. , but hes great at his job.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting rigor, exams, and polarizing outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Split

55/100

“Thomas is an excellent teacher. That being said, if you're not strong in math, I would advise against taking his courses.”

📝

20/100

“ USC, Harvard, and MIT.”

⚖️

28/100

“ but fair.”

🚪 Dropout Risk

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are NEVER boring.
  • He truly cares about his students and teaches more than just stats he teaches life lessons.
  • the lectures he has are no help to the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but hes great at his job.
  • stats is already hard he makes it 10 times harder
  • Put in the work and you'll learn a lot.

Theme 3

⏰ About Policies

  • dosent except any work even if its a minute late
  • , so if you miss a class your missing a lot.
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews across formats with a but moderate sample size and mixed years.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH2276 reviews
MATH2453 reviews
14751 review
MATH1151 review
MATH2621 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2