AI Rate Professor

Real Estate

DeAnna Gossett

REALES007 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

, but watch for section reliability and participation requirements.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and flexibleClear rubricReal estate practicalExtra creditParticipation matters
  • Most students find , and fairly easy when work is completed.
  • , and encouraging in communication.
  • One In person review says she left mid-semester, which is a notable reliability red flag.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Course is often easy if and assignments, but .

Online reviews stress easy content with participation penalties; In person grades vary more and include a mid-semester disruption claim.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students describe practical agent-related work that and relatively easy, with only occasional heaviness.

Online comments are clearer about ease; In person difficulty ratings are more middle-of-the-road.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and some do not, so expectations appear section-dependent.

Both Online and In person .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Positive recommendation is common for clarity and care, tempered by one serious reliability complaint and .

Online recommendations are stronger; In person includes the left mid-semester concern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Clear rubrics and , but and participation penalties also show up.

Format shift

Online leans more flexible and encouraging; In .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Work is practical and usually manageable, with , and discussions.

Format shift

Online notes light-to-moderate load; In person mentions papers and reading readiness.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students value her knowledge, encouragement, and availability, reduced by one report that she left mid-semester.

Format shift

Online teaching praise is very strong; In person is split between helpful and reliability concern.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments center on homework, discussions, papers, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In and emergency-friendly, but one student says she left mid-semester never to be seen again.

Main concern

Possible mid-semester instructor disappearance and .

What students said

“Alright Class, She left mid semester never to be seen again”
Reales007
“If an emergency happens, this professor is willing to help in any way.”
Reales007
“This professor was very helpful and .”
Reales007

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students strongly praise clarity, encouragement, flexibility, and ease for busy schedules.

Main concern

Skipping discussions and smaller tasks can cost a higher grade even when content is easy.

What students said

“ and easy to understand with a .”
Reales007
“Class was relatively easy. Felt a little heavy at times but overall fairly easy.”
Reales007
“her positive spirit and energy in her emails were incredibly encouraging.”
Reales007

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, open-book status, or proctoring policies.

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews .

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Gossett is a very experienced and knowledgeable individual. and easy to understand with a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, balancing caring clarity against one reliability red flag; Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

76/100

“ and easy to understand with a .”

❤️ About Character

80/100

“her positive spirit and energy in her emails were incredibly encouraging.”

⚠️ Reliability Concern

40/100

“Alright Class, She left mid semester never to be seen again”

👍 Recommendation

70/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • One of the busy schedule.
  • The things you will be doing are related to being an actual agent.
  • This professor was very helpful and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class was relatively easy. Felt a little heavy at times but overall fairly easy.
  • I should have received an A but I didn't do the and a .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She understood my situation in every instance and provided me with extra .
  • If an emergency happens, this professor is willing to help in any way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews with mixed detail and a major reliability outlier give a usable but not fully settled picture.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Reales0076 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values