AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Roxanne Williams

CD34 · CHDEV065 · CD65 · CHLD11 · CD1 · CD45 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid if you have any other option; and silence make success feel like a coin flip.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear AssignmentsNo FeedbackUnresponsive EmailsTough GraderUnorganized
  • Most students report , and emails ignored for a week or more
  • Tough and when they work hard
  • A few recent or improved experiences exist, but the

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some still finish with an A, but unreliable and high-effort.

Online reviews stress unfair low scores; a few in-person students still got As despite confusion.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content itself is not described as advanced, but chaos and material.

Difficulty complaints are similar online and in person, driven more by organization than concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and mixed in person, with limited benefit described.

; several in-person reviews say attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The vast majority urge others to find another professor due to disorganization and no support.

; only a couple of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and unexplained low scores dominate even when students say they completed every task.

Format shift

but also appear in person.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is not always huge, but many papers and .

Format shift

Online mentions many papers and three books; in .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students say she , and leaves them to figure everything out alone.

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching quality; rare positive notes claim recent improvement.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Papers, portfolios, lesson plans, and .

Format shift

Online is assignment and paper heavy; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, poor organization, and weak email replies, with rare praise.

Main concern

Accessibility and clarity problems persist face to face as well.

What students said

“ ! Email her and you wont get a response. .”
CD34
“her lectures are quiet and , and she never answered emails”
CHLD11
“I was shocked and surprised by the rating grade that Professor Roxanne Williams received.”
CD65

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students overwhelmingly , and tough scores without explanation.

Main concern

You may complete everything thoroughly and still get a low grade with .

What students said

“You and she will give you a horrible grade but ”
CHDEV065
“ that you did it right”
CD34
“She is super unorganized, won't answer students questions, she grades poorly”
CD65

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely detail exam proctoring; .

Assignment HeavyUnclear RubricsLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments note tests not based on lectures and .

Vague Project DirectionsTests Not From Lectures
“Vague when explaining assignments, test not based off her lectures”
CD1
“she is not very clear in in”
CD1

Online

Online reviews focus on unclear papers and .

Unclear AssignmentsLate GradingNo Feedback
“she and ”
CHDEV065
“none of instructions)”
CD65

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Find another Professor if you're thinking of taking her class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews (10 online, 9 in person), highlighting disorganization and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

18/100

“ !!!”

📉 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She is the ! She never response to emails and !”

🧾

22/100

“You and she will give you a horrible grade but ”

📬 Unresponsive

20/100

“If you email her or try to get in reach with ”

Theme 1

📂 About Organization

  • discrepancies galore between syllabus & online course
  • doesnt know how to navigate the site

Theme 2

📝 About Assignments and Grades

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • never answered emails
  • won't answer students questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews spanning 2010-2025 with highly consistent negative themes across online and in person support strong confidence.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 514

Course coverage

CD658 reviews
CHDEV0654 reviews
CD13 reviews
CD342 reviews
CD451 review
Show 1 more courses
CHLD111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1