AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Robert Irvin

PSY41 · PSYCH1 · PSYC41 · LIFESPANPSYCH · PSY101 · PSYCHOLOGY41 · PYSCH1111 · PSYCHOLOGY1 · LIFESPAN041 · PSYCH41 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if ; do not expect engaging lectures or strong advocacy.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTextbook ReaderBoring LecturesOpen Note ExamsHeavy ReadingPlagiarism Focused
  • Many students say .
  • and an attainable grade if you read.
  • , and mismatch between lectures and tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, but only if you do substantial textbook reading and a research paper.

Nearly all ease-of-A evidence is in person; the one online review is an F after a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Material is not conceptually brutal, but boredom and content requires.

In-person students repeatedly call content easy yet boring; online has no content-difficulty detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and sometimes mandatory, with mixed emphasis on showing up versus reading alone.

In-person comments mix no-attendance and mandatory flags; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Take-again rate is very low and modern comments , and low care for students.

Recommendation ; the lone online review is also strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students report , and mystery grades until late.

Format shift

Strictness and plagiarism focus appear mainly in in-person and recent reviews.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Workload , and at least one research or observation paper.

Format shift

; online has no assignment-load detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Dominant complaint is that he reads publisher slides or the book with little original instruction or useful answers.

Format shift

Poor teaching themes dominate in-person reviews across many years.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and occasional observation project.

Format shift

Assessment detail .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person psych classes are repeatedly described as boring textbook lectures with .

Main concern

Tests often feel disconnected from class, and and plagiarism checks.

What students said

“He literally just reads from the textbook the entire class.”
PSYCHOLOGY1
“ in the text.”
PSYCH1
“boring lecturer. .”
PSYCH41

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is extremely negative about an F after a and no flexibility.

Main concern

Student and an F without taking the class.

What students said

“He does not care about his students at all. and he gave me an "F"”
LIFESPANPSYCH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many , though one student mentions downloadable recording software.

Open Book ExamsOpen Note QuizzesResearch PaperScreen Recording Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

note, with quizzes and a paper still required.

Open Book ExamsOpen Note QuizzesResearch Paper
“Open book exams , 1 observation Mid term and final.”
PSY41
“all quizzestests are open note (but make sure to still read the book!)”
PSYCH1
“ .”
PSYCH41

Online

The single online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He literally just reads from the textbook the entire class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews (1 online, 27 in person), highlighting persistent lecture and reading themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“He does not care about his classes. All he does it read straight from the textbook for hours without any input.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ .”

📖

58/100

“Read the book,follow the and fianl.You will do well.”

📝 Open-Note Exams

72/100

“all quizzestests are open note (but make sure to still read the book!)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He literally just reads from the textbook the entire class
  • Cool teacher but boring
  • Uses book publisher's lecture notes; he adds no original content

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A.
  • in the text
  • He's a very fair with grades

Theme 3

⚠️ About Care & Policy

  • He is obsessed with cheating and plagiarism
  • There's a doesn't even grade himself
  • He does not care about his students at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews span two decades with recurring themes , and open-note tests, giving strong consistency despite one online outlier.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 510
3 out of 59
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PSYCH4110 reviews
PSYCH14 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY13 reviews
LIFESPANPSYCH2 reviews
PSY412 reviews
Show 5 more courses
PSYC412 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY412 reviews
LIFESPAN0411 review
PSY1011 review
PYSCH11111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2