AI Rate Professor

Real Estate

Enciso Givhan

REALES021 · REALES3 · BUS038 · BUS001 · RE021 · RFIN475 · REFINUCLA · BUSINESS1 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
58.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can self-manage deadlines and handle last-minute posting; otherwise pick a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProInspirationalLast-Minute PostingInconsistentHeavy ReadingKnows Real Estate
  • Older reviews call her an , and and business teacher.
  • Recent reviews accuse her of , and .
  • Content can still be easy to pass with As, but stress from disorganization is a major theme.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many students report As and A+s and call the class easy if work is submitted, despite chaos around timing.

Both online and logistics are criticized.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Material is approachable and and modules rather than extreme theory.

Online comments stress easy content with poor planning; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

as not mandatory, especially online and some in-person sections.

Online ; in-person is mixed but often flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About half the students rave about her wisdom while recent reviewers urge others to run.

In-person historical reviews are warmer; recent online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Students often earn high grades and call her an .

Format shift

Both formats report easy grades, though .

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Weekly reading, videos, and .

Format shift

Online stress comes from last-minute posts; in-person notes regular weekly work and reading.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Strong subject knowledge and inspiration clash with recurring organization and communication failures.

Format shift

In-person older reviews are excellent; recent online and some in-person reviews are poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

36/100

Weekly assignments, discussions, reading, and modules drive the grade more than big traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews lean more positive on inspiration and clarity, but and late posts.

Main concern

Inconsistent organization and weak communication can undermine an otherwise knowledgeable instructor.

What students said

“ SO EVER. AVOID. Lack of professionalism, not timely, and has zero clue what she is doing.”
RE021
“she is my and provides example of her experience in the field.”
RFIN475
“Absolutely the ... I love professor G and ”
BUSINESS1

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between gem-level praise and sharp complaints , and unresponsiveness.

Main concern

Last-minute work drops and .

What students said

“She was late on putti g the work online but will expect you to have it done by the deadline.”
REALES3
“Run for the hills. , but .”
RE021
“Overall Professor Givhan is a real gem and she is willing to help you get the grade you want.”
REALES021

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not clearly prove strict proctoring.

Small TestsWeekly AssignmentsReading HeavyDiscussion Posts

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and mixed comments mention small tests, discussions, and online submission more than webcam or Lockdown Browser.

Small TestsDiscussionsOnline Submission
“ , small tests (no big deal), have to participate in discussions”
BUS001

Online

Online comments mention exams and weekly work but focus more on late posting and .

Weekly AssignmentsInconsistent GradingGrammar Errors on Exams
“Grammar errors in and assignments. .”
BUS001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run for the hills. , but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews spanning online and in-person formats, highlighting polarized views on inspiration versus disorganization. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Subject Wisdom

70/100

“I appreciate Professor Givhan for all of the wisdom that she brings to the class.”

⏰ Last-Minute Chaos

28/100

“ if you don't get them in.”

📈 Easy Grades Possible

76/100

“If you do your assignments there's no way u shouldn't get an A in this class.”

🔀 Polarized Recommendation

52/100

“ SO EVER. AVOID.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a great instructor
  • bringing so much more to the table then any text could ever provide

Theme 2

⚠️ About Organization

  • course is a moving target

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

  • yes there is a lot of reading
  • willing to help you get the grade you want

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

18 reviews across many years show a and newer organization complaints, giving a reliable polarized picture.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BUS0014 reviews
RE0213 reviews
BUS0382 reviews
BUSINESS12 reviews
REALES0212 reviews
Show 3 more courses
REALES32 reviews
RFIN4752 reviews
REFINUCLA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1