AI Rate Professor

Biology

Bahta Abraha

CHEM51 · CHEM3490 · CHEM051 · CHEMISTRY051 · CHEM102 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandTeach YourselfTest HeavyLanguage BarrierHigh Drop Rate
  • Majority of reviews say lectures are incoherent and you must teach yourself.
  • Exams and drills are hard with and .
  • A and offers multiple chances if you attend and study heavily.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and test-heavy tags dominate; passing often requires massive self-study despite occasional leniency.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students describe sink-or-swim chemistry with fast pacing and hard drills that force heavy home study.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Tags and comments warn that skipping class means failing and .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Would-take-again is 0% with and teach-yourself complaints.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and gives chances to pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of exams, hard drills, and advice to study five hours per lecture hour.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Most students say lectures are hard to understand and force self-teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

TEST HEAVY pattern with drills that prepare for exams and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chemistry students overwhelmingly report unclear lectures, language barriers, heavy testing, and the .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“If i could give this professor a zero i would. You will Basically teach yourself in this class.”
CHEM51
“Very hard to understand professor. . You must study in order to keep up! Lots of exams.”
CHEM051
“Excellent subject, most of the lecture was incoherent. There's a strong language barrier between students and professor.”
CHEMISTRY051

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

tests and high failure pressure.

Test HeavyLots of ExamsHard Drills

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and high drop rates.

Test HeavyLots of ExamsHard Drills
“Don't do it.”
CHEM102
“ . You must study in order to keep up! Lots of exams.”
CHEM51
“his drills will save u on the so pay attention to your mistakes on the drills.”
CHEM051

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If i could give this professor a zero i would. You will Basically teach yourself in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting self-teaching burden and test pressure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“His lectures are not really understandable.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“If .”

📝

28/100

“Lots of exams. Started with a full class and more than half of the class dropped.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You will Basically teach yourself in this class.
  • most of the lecture was incoherent
  • Very hard to understand professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Passed this class by the grace of God!
  • This is a sink or swim class.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • more than half of the class dropped
  • Class started full mostly half class dropped out!
  • !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly older in-person reviews show strong negative consistency, though many lack grades and span 2012-2024.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM514 reviews
CHEM0512 reviews
CHEM1021 review
CHEM34901 review
CHEMISTRY0511 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1