AI Rate Professor

Paralegal

Michelle Kazadi

LIT4624 · PARA11 · PARALEGAL010 · PL4642 · PARA18 · PARAL4642 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already know legal basics and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared lecturesTough graderPolitically motivatedInconsistent clarityPolarizing
  • Many , and unfair in class control and content accuracy.
  • Recent negative reviews dominate while older praise is mixed and thinner on detail.
  • One and helpful lectures, but it is an outlier.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A few easy older notes exist, but , and sabotage language make an A costly.

Online evidence is one A with graded-by-few-things; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

and specialized pleadings content requiring prior legal knowledge.

Online mentions a good bit of reading; tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and online advice says lectures help chapter breakdowns.

Both formats that ; many older reviews omit it.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and recent detailed comments strongly advise against her for unfair teaching and unpreparedness.

The ; most explicit in-person answers say no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and unfair grading complaints outweigh a few fair-grades comments.

Format shift

Online tags graded by few things; and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Homework is sometimes light, but heavy reading and .

Format shift

Online stresses textbook reading; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Dominant themes are unprepared slides, student-led chaos, inaccurate law, and only sporadic clarity praise.

Format shift

Online lecture praise is strong but single; and severe.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and hands-on pleadings or discovery work depending on course.

Format shift

Online emphasizes lectures plus reading; and assignment prompts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

unfair grading, inaccurate or , and weak class control, with a few older positive outliers.

Main concern

Students , and feeling sabotaged rather than taught.

What students said

“Not a good professor. Very unfair and teaches inaccurate information. Very politically motivated instead of actually teaching law.”
PARALEGAL010
“The worse teacher at this college. I'm certain she hates her students and wouldn't doubt she's trying to outright sabotage the program.”
PARA18
“She doesn't know what she's doing and you won't learn much. It's so ridiculous how unprepared she is.”
PARA11

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single recent online review is highly positive: , heavy reading required.

Main concern

Only one online review so the format experience is not well established.

What students said

“Professor Kazadi was an amazing teacher, no complaints. and was generous when it came to tech errors.”
PARALEGAL010

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests reward studying terminology and review questions but several students call them difficult and detail-trap heavy.

Terminology testsHard testsReview questions

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and small spoken details rather than spoon-feeding.

Hard testsTerminology focusReview questions
“She tells you exactly what she wants and if you study the terminology and review questions.”
PL4642
“ . Good luck.”
PARAL4642

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not a good professor. Very unfair and teaches inaccurate information. Very politically motivated instead of actually teaching law.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews spanning 2012-2025, weighing recent negative in-person themes against one strong online outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She doesn't know what she's doing and you won't learn much. It's so ridiculous how unprepared she is.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“The worse teacher at this college. I'm certain she hates her students and wouldn't doubt she's trying to outright sabotage the program.”

⚖️

30/100

“Not a good professor. Very unfair and teaches inaccurate information.”

📚 Online Outlier Praise

85/100

“Professor Kazadi was an amazing teacher, no complaints. and was generous when it came to tech errors.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't appear to know the .
  • She sometimes lets the .
  • She is a good teacher. Her teaching style is very friendly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . Good luck.
  • As long as you do the reading and .
  • You need some legal background if you're taking this professor.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness & Climate

  • Very unfair and teaches inaccurate information.
  • Very politically motivated instead of actually teaching law.
  • I'm certain she hates her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews span 2012-2025 with consistent negative teaching themes, but sparse grades and only one online review limit precision.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PARALEGAL0104 reviews
PARA112 reviews
LIT46241 review
PARA181 review
PARAL46421 review
Show 1 more courses
PL46421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values