AI Rate Professor

Education

Marlene Shepherd

NUTR101 · NUTRITION1088 · FAM1088 · FAMCONSNUTRI · FAMCS1092 · NUTRITION021 · NUTRI021 · FAMCS21 · CHDEV001 · ECON238 · FAMSCI21 · NUT21 · NUTRI101 · CHDEV1 · FCS021 · CD1 · FCS1090 · W8523FAMCS021 · CD10 · NUTRITION21 · FAMCS021 · FAM021 · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid unless you can follow hyper-specific writing rules and handle a large busywork load for moderate grades.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderSentence-count pedantHeavy writing loadCold communicationGet ready to read
  • and formats; .
  • and writing more than deep content difficulty.
  • Many students report slow or and harsh tone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible if you follow every format rule and never miss sentence counts, but picky deductions make it costly.

Online recent reviews emphasize picky grading; some older online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Subject matter is not advanced, but volume of reading and writing creates real friction.

Both formats stress busywork over conceptual difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

; in-person is mixed but often not the .

Online mostly optional; some in-person mark mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Low take-again rate and , and cold communication.

Online recent reviews are harsher; in-person still split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and minor errors.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Heavy reading plus long multi-question writing assignments that .

Format shift

Online students especially call the load ridiculous and time-consuming.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Expectations can be clear, but .

Format shift

Online recent quality dips hard; older in-person reviews more mixed-positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades driven by frequent writing modules and .

Format shift

Online is almost all module writing; and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some praise clear criteria and feedback; , and .

Main concern

Lots of writing and .

What students said

“Communication is minimal, and emails are often answered very late or not at all. ”
FAM021
“Lots and lots of writing! Make sure you follow exactly what she wants in the .”
FAMCS021
“Terrible. ”
CHDEV1

Remote format

Online

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and poor warmth or email response.

Main concern

Excessive writing for and weak communication.

What students said

“ warm.”
FAMCS021
“accusing my final of being AI-generated using AI, with zero proof. .”
FAMCS021
“When she says, 2 paragraphs 6 sentences each, etc. She means it. One sentence short will cost you a .”
CD10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams exist and can be timed multi-choice, but the bigger risk is assignment .

Timed online testsMultiple choiceModule-based prepWriting-heavy overall

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study from notes/modules; not clearly open-book.

Multiple choiceStudy notesModerate tests
“Exams are all multiple choice (50-100 questions).”
FCS021
“ ; read and study notes!”
W8523FAMCS021

Online

; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Timed testsOne tryModule reading
“ : 40 questions, 1 hour, one try, no review.”
FAMCS021
“She also leaves the with busy schedules”
FAM021

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and low warmth. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

28/100

“ warm.”

📝 Workload Pain

22/100

“One class with her seems like 2 classes. .”

👎 Recommendation

32/100

“my advice dont take any classes with her, too much stress.”

📐 Format Rules

40/100

“You MUST write a specific number of sentences and answer each question to get full credit”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Tone

  • not very warm
  • lacks warmth and understanding
  • condescending, tasteless response

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • One sentence short will cost you a
  • Easy A if you work for it, read the material

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • a LOT of TIME CONSUMING work
  • ridiculous amount of busy work
  • Get ready to read

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with strong recent online volume and recurring themes on workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 512
1 out of 512

Course coverage

FAMCS02110 reviews
CD106 reviews
FAM0216 reviews
CHDEV13 reviews
FAMCS213 reviews
Show 17 more courses
NUT213 reviews
CD12 reviews
FAMSCI212 reviews
FCS0212 reviews
CHDEV0011 review
ECON2381 review
FAM10881 review
FAMCONSNUTRI1 review
FAMCS10921 review
FCS10901 review
NUTR1011 review
NUTRI0211 review
NUTRI1011 review
NUTRITION0211 review
NUTRITION10881 review
NUTRITION211 review
W8523FAMCS0211 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

14

B+ 4 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1