AI Rate Professor

Finance

Gjenaii Enciso-Givhan

0444BUS001 · Y3201 · REPRACTICE · REECON · BUSINESS001 · BUSW044 · BUS001 · FIN475 · REAL7 · RE7 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Prefer a recent in-person section if available; treat current online offerings as high risk.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLate ModulesInconsistent GradingPolarized ReviewsHeavy ReadingGhosting Emails
  • Recent online reviews slam late modules, ignored emails, and .
  • Older in-person business and real estate classes often call her engaging and caring.
  • - and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Strong students report As, but tough or and .

Online reviews emphasize half-credit grading; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

and real estate material, but volume of reading and .

Online difficulty scores look low, yet students call the logistics stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

while several online students report non-mandatory presence.

Online ; in-person more often lists mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and recent online disasters outweigh older praise for many current students.

Online is strongly negative lately; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Multiple students report harsh half-credit scoring and unfixed .

Format shift

Online looks stricter and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Reading, papers, and last-minute modules create a heavy load for many sections.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of work; online adds chaos from late posting.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

, but recent online delivery is widely described as disorganized and unresponsive.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Papers, modules, discussions, and reading assignments drive the course more than classic exams.

Format shift

Reviews across formats emphasize papers and modules over formal exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are largely glowing about passion, engagement, and career-style teaching, with a few workload and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“professor G is one of the .”
BUS001
“She is .”
BUS001
“ . It is the biggest waste of my time & money.”
RE7

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online classes frequently post modules late, change due dates without notice, and leave emails unanswered.

Main concern

Disorganization and .

What students said

“She grades and assigns very inconsistently.”
BUS001
“She posts modules late, doesn't adjust due dates, makes mistakes on most grades without fixing them.”
REAL7
“Awful. Publishes modules late, without explicit instructions.”
REECON

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and focus more on papers and module work.

Assignment HeavyLate ModulesLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

beyond general coursework and occasional pop quizzes.

Pop Quizzes MentionedPaper Heavy
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
REAL7
“you will have so much work, you wont have time to learn anything.”
RE7

Online

Online comments center on late modules and .

Module AssignmentsInconsistent Deadlines
“She never gave us a .”
BUS001
“ the last minute.”
REAL7

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you want a joke of an unqualified teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews (7 online, 15 in person), highlighting format split and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

⏰ Late Online Modules

20/100

“She posts modules late, doesn't adjust due dates, makes mistakes on most grades without fixing them.”

💬 In-Person Praise

85/100

“She's the best!!!!”

📧 Communication Gaps

25/100

“She ghosted most of her students by not answering emails.”

📚 Heavy Workload

32/100

“she does require a lot of work but she accommodates you if you need extra time or help.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Delivery

  • Publishes modules late, without explicit instructions
  • Doesn't grade work

Theme 2

❤️

  • Great class, patient and caring professor
  • makes learning fun
  • Excellent teacher; professional, knowledgeable, humble

Theme 3

📝 About Work and Grades

  • if you did the assignments and submitted them on time she'd give half credit
  • So many papers
  • extraordinarily slow in correcting assignments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews with a but time-sensitive evidence, stronger on online risk than on current in-person quality.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

BUS0018 reviews
REAL74 reviews
RE72 reviews
REECON2 reviews
0444BUS0011 review
Show 5 more courses
BUSINESS0011 review
BUSW0441 review
FIN4751 review
REPRACTICE1 review
Y32011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1