AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Curtis Johnson

CD30 · CD38 · CHDEV011 · CD22 · W3544 · CD39 · 12491W01 · CD23 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Good pick if you show up, participate honestly, and stay on top of reading and discussions.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringParticipation MattersClear Syllabus OnlineInspirationalMandatory Attendance
  • Many students call him caring, funny, and inspiring for child development careers.
  • Attendance and participation matter a lot, and a few call him defensive or hard to please.
  • Online but slower email replies.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Most reported grades are A or A+ when students complete work, though one C+ shows effort still matters.

Online summer reviews report As; in-person also reports many As with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Material is approachable for child development, but short online terms and .

Online is fast-paced with lots of reading; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Nearly and participation as required to pass.

Both online and in-person reviews emphasize mandatory attendance or participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Majority praise his care and teaching, tempered by a few strong personality complaints.

In-person praise is warmer; one recent online review is strongly negative on respect.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

Clear criteria and help many students, though .

Format shift

Online comments stress clear criteria; one in-person course felt harder to please.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Assignments and if you keep pace weekly.

Format shift

Online short terms feel busier with weekly discussions and quizzes from reading.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Students repeatedly call him clear, funny, and hard to understand.

Format shift

In-person inspiration themes are strongest; online organization is solid but communication lags.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Quizzes from readings, discussions, projects, and final.

Format shift

Online leans on quizzes and discussions; and attendance work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students often find him inspiring and organized, though a minority report defensiveness and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Excellent professor, He cares about children and the future teachers going into this field.”
12491W01
“He will challenge you to be a better student and better person.”
W3544
“If having a scattered, self-involved, grammatically-challenged, hyper-defensive professor is your THING, . Curtis.”
CD23

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online summer classes post on time with , and required discussion participation.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Provided a and .”
CD39
“he was not very responsive on e-mail, taking over a .”
CD38
“I feel my voice is not allowed and I am not respect by him.”
CD30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are mostly reading-based quizzes and participation rather than strict proctored mega-exams.

Quizzes From ReadingDiscussionsClear Criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and focus more on attendance, projects, and assignment completion.

Attendance BasedProjectsExtra Credit
“As longest .”
W3544
“ and hard to please.”
CD22

Online

and weekly discussion posts are required.

Reading QuizzesWeekly Discussions
“ SO READ! Participation in .”
CD39
“He provided a and .”
CD38

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Excellent professor, He cares about children and the future teachers going into this field.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (3 online, 6 in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Mentor

80/100

“He will challenge you to be a better student and better person, he will believe you and encourage you to be the .”

📌

22/100

“Your punctuality and .”

📋

70/100

“Provided a and .”

⚠️ Personality Clash

25/100

“scattered, self-involved, grammatically-challenged, hyper-defensive professor”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • understand
  • His sense of humor is awesome
  • He is inspiring as well as funny

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • If you stay on top of your work your going to pass
  • SO READ
  • gives

Theme 3

🗣️ About Classroom Climate

  • I feel my voice is not allowed and I am not respect by him
  • don't try to bs him
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews with mixed years and detail levels support a medium-confidence blend of praise and personality concerns.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

W35442 reviews
12491W011 review
CD221 review
CD231 review
CD301 review
Show 3 more courses
CD381 review
CD391 review
CHDEV0111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1