AI Rate Professor

English

R Sandowicz

ENG28 · ENG8052 · ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · EE · ENGLI103 · WORLDLITERATUR · ENG101 · ENG203 · ENG7721 · ENGLISH · W3950 · ENGLISH28 · ENG103 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you want a brutal writing workout and can accept a B or C despite strong effort.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSo Many PapersHarsh FeedbackHeavy ReadingUnclear Expectations
  • Harsh grader who rarely gives As and .
  • Heavy paper and reading load with delayed or unhelpful feedback.
  • and skipping hurts your grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students repeatedly say A and that he does not believe in giving As.

Both online and ; online comments more often mention zeros and delayed grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and deep material make the content demanding even for English majors.

Difficulty is high in both formats; load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and missing class costs points.

ENG101 and ENG28 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Would-take-again is about 30 percent and recent comments urge students to find another professor.

Recommendation is low in both formats; a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and students report A-level work scored as B or C with little useful feedback.

Format shift

Online reviews more often describe zeros for citation issues; .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

So , and heavy reading appear across most courses.

Format shift

Workload is heavy online and in person with little difference in paper volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students learn college-level writing, but many call lectures unhelpful, feedback rude or vague, and .

Format shift

In-person has more mixed praise; online skews strongly negative on teaching and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and papers, with quizzes tied to weekly reading.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers; online also stresses delayed essay feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some praise clear expectations and real writing growth, while many warn of , and .

Main concern

Strict essay style requirements and .

What students said

“He literally said during the first week of class that he doesnt believe in giving As.”
ENG101
“He is a , and will give you a C on an A essay.”
ENG101
“I genuinely enjoyed Mr. Sandowicz's classes. I've took him twice.”
ENG28

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and grades that feel unfairly low.

Main concern

Late or .

What students said

“Gives C's when the grade should have been an A. .”
ENG103
“Never grades in a timely manner and gives F's where just points off should have been given.”
ENG8052
“I received 0 credit for two of my essays because the MLA was not done properly and the professor would not let me resubmit them.”
WORLDLITERATUR

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Weekly reading quizzes and multiple essays dominate; exams are not described as open-book or heavily proctored.

Weekly QuizzesReading-Based QuizzesEssay HeavyStudy Guide Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person classes use weekly quizzes with study guides plus several essays; rewrite of lowest essay sometimes allowed.

Weekly QuizzesStudy GuideEssay Rewrite Option
“He gives a quiz weekly (gives you a study guide beforehand).”
W3950
“ if you keep up with the reading!”
ENGLISH28

Online

Online reviews focus on papers and .

Many PapersDelayed Grading
“he doesn't grade his assignments which give you no indication of your grade to help with future assignments.”
ENG203

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Sandowicz is one of the worst English professors that Ive ever had. He literally said during the first week of class that he doesnt believe in giving As.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 , and mixed teaching quality. Credibility rating: High.

📉

18/100

“He is a , and will give you a C on an A essay.”

📝 Paper Overload

22/100

“There were a lot of ... This class was so terrible.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

30/100

“ .”

📚 Learning Possible With Effort

55/100

“If you want to learn, this is the .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • he doesnt believe in giving As
  • Gives C's when the grade should have been an A
  • how he likes his papers written

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read! as well
  • assigns a lot of work
  • So many papers

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • He does not give out any helpful feedback
  • Professor Sandowicz was a good professor
  • He is eloquent.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

28 reviews spanning 2006 to 2023 with and heavy-paper themes give solid confidence despite some polarization.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG1016 reviews
ENG1034 reviews
ENG284 reviews
ENG80522 reviews
ENGLISH1032 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ENGLISH282 reviews
EE1 review
ENG2031 review
ENG77211 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGLI1031 review
ENGLISH1 review
W39501 review
WORLDLITERATUR1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

5

B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1