AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nancy Foreman

MATH128 · MATH118 · MATH · MATH236 · STAT227 · MATH112 · STATS227 · MATH127 · MATH115 · MATH105 · MATHS125 · CALCULUS · STATISTICS · MATH227 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend every class, do all worksheets, and use tutors when stuck; skip if you need a slow, soft landing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring if you tryNote sheet on testsAttendance criticalMixed difficultyHelpful for serious students
  • Many students praise her care, worksheets, and .
  • Stats and some algebra sections feel hard; .
  • , and asking for help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible with , and tutoring, but many say you must work hard.

Online sample is small; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material ranges from approachable algebra to tough stats depending on course and student prep.

In-person stats comments report more challenge than some lower-level classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly required; skipping hurts quizzes and understanding.

Both online and as important or mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and fairness, but a consistent minority strongly advises against her.

Recent online is mixed; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some call her tough while others get makeups, , and note sheets; effort is rewarded but grades are not free.

Format shift

and extra-credit stories.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and tests create steady work rather than light busywork.

Format shift

In-person stats often feels heavier; online still expects participation and homework.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

and genuine care, while others find pace, wording, or .

Format shift

Online split is extreme; in-person average leans positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Tests and quizzes drive outcomes, though worksheets and .

Format shift

sheets.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fairness, with a vocal minority calling tests mismatched and teaching rushed.

Main concern

Mandatory attendance and for some.

What students said

“She lets you use a sheet of .”
MATH227
“ teaches in the class.”
STAT227
“Nancy Foreman was more helpful than any other math teacher.”
MATH127

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

two strong care and clarity reviews and .

Main concern

Lectures can feel long or for some students.

What students said

“If you're not good at math, just take her class.”
STATISTICS
“She makes Math Statistics so easy.”
MATH227
“She words everything in way you can't understand.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often hard but sometimes allow a note page, calculator, or open book depending on term.

Note sheet allowedCalculator requiredWorksheets prepare quizzesSome open-book reports

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and calculator; some students say while others call them fair if you study worksheets.

Notes sheet on testsTI-84 calculatorOpen book in some termsHard tests
“She lets you use a sheet of ”
MATH227
“ ”
MATH227
“ from her lecture, worksheets, and/or statistic book”
STAT227

Online

Online comments ; focus is lecture clarity and participation.

Lecture heavyParticipation focused
“She likes students participate”
MATH227
“Her lectures are long and can get boring, but they are very informative and useful”
STATISTICS

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I wish she could have taught me every math class I ever took.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, balancing majority praise with minority test and pace complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She makes the material very clear, always makes sure students understand everything before moving on”

👍 Recommendation Split

62/100

“If you're not good at math, just take her class.”

📝

55/100

“ but allows a page of notes.”

⚠️ Critical Counterpoint

30/100

“ teaches in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • genuinely cares for her students
  • very helpful and clear

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is not an easy A, but if you work hard with her help, you'll pass
  • Saw people turning their 45% to 96 %
  • just didn't study

Theme 3

🧪

  • lets you use a sheet of
  • BUY TI 83 AND LEARN HOW TO USE IT

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

38 reviews over many years show a clear majority-positive pattern with a and pace.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH22711 reviews
MATH1275 reviews
STAT2274 reviews
MATH1283 reviews
STATISTICS3 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH1122 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
MATH1182 reviews
CALCULUS1 review
MATH1 review
MATH1051 review
MATH2361 review
MATHS1251 review
STATS2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2