AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Angela Cranon-Charles

POLSCI001 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless and and grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedTough GraderTeach YourselfUnclear CriteriaMissed Deadlines
  • Multiple students report disorganization, late modules, and .
  • Some still earn As if and follow directions carefully.
  • Overall recommendation is low with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible with self-study, but and opaque criteria make an A unreliable.

Online reviews show both A+ and ; In person reports C+.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students must teach themselves, read heavily, and navigate missing modules and .

Both Online and In person describe organizational friction that raises effective difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

as not mandatory, though one Online review marks yes.

Online evidence is mixed but ; the In .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

, and repeated organization complaints.

Online and In person reviews both lean negative; only one Online review is positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

becoming a B.

Format shift

Online reviews drive the ; In person also reports penalty for .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and participation make the load feel high.

Format shift

Online tags highlight get-ready-to-read and participation; In person stresses assignment inconsistency.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students say you teach yourself and and unfriendly when contacted.

Format shift

Both formats criticize organization; one .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of readings, group project, participation, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention exams from the book and a group project; In .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person feedback cites inconsistent instructions, unfriendly outreach, and late modules.

Main concern

and delayed weekly modules.

What students said

“ and then penalizes you for it. Not friendly when you reach out.”
POLSCI-001

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and self-teaching required.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“My percentage on canvas was a 96 yet I was given a .”
POLSCI-001
“You pretty much teach yourself. She's very unorganized expects you to meet deadlines when assignments aren't even open on the due date.”
POLSCI-001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear textbook-based while course management issues create extra risk.

Exam Questions From BookSelf Study RequiredGroup Project

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Online exams are described as questions straight from the book if you read the chapters.

Questions From BookSelf-TeachingGroup Project
“If you follow her directions and read the chapters you'll do fine, exam questions are straight from the book.”
POLSCI-001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“My percentage on canvas was a 96 yet I was given a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting disorganization and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

22/100

“ .”

📂 Unorganized Course

25/100

“She's very unorganized expects you to meet deadlines when assignments aren't even open on the due date.”

⚖️

22/100

“Professor did not have a .”

Theme 1

📁 About Organization

  • Constantly forgets to post modules for the week days later
  • You pretty much teach yourself

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • My percentage on canvas was a 96 yet I was given a B

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent detailed reviews show consistent organization and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

POLSCI-0014 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values