Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
62/100As are common if you complete the work, but grading is hard and second chances still require real effort.
Online easy-A comments exist alongside one chaotic section; most A-with-work evidence is in person.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
As are common if you complete the work, but grading is hard and second chances still require real effort.
Online easy-A comments exist alongside one chaotic section; most A-with-work evidence is in person.
Is the course easy?
Most students rate content easy and practical, focused on Cisco skills rather than abstract theory.
Both formats call the material approachable; online difficulty spikes only when organization fails.
Is attendance flexible?
Multiple reviews mark attendance mandatory, with participation points tied to timely work.
Mandatory notes appear in both online and in-person reviews when stated.
Is this professor recommended?
Students repeatedly call him the x x x and would retake if preparing for certs.
In-person praise is near-unanimous; online recommendation is mixed due to one unorganized section.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
52/100
Grading is described as hard yet fair, with second chances when students redo work.
Format shift
Second-chance comments are mainly in-person; online mentions wrong quiz answers.
Workload
Heavy
32/100
Lots of homework and papers are a recurring theme across courses.
Format shift
Homework load is mentioned online and in person.
Teaching experience
Excellent
86/100
Most students describe clear, brief, organized, and helpful teaching with strong cert prep.
Format shift
In-person teaching is highly rated; online has one severe organization complaint.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
38/100
Homework and assignment completion dominate; some cert exams and quizzes also matter.
Format shift
One online CISCO1 section had no quizzes or exams.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
kind, clear, brief, tough but fair, and strong cert preparation.
Main concern
Expect lots of homework and firm grading unless you put in the work.
What students said
“Best Cisco instructor I've ever had!”
“Mr. Kami is tough, but fair.”
“Grading is hard, but always gives you a 2nd chance to make it up even though he says he won't.”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
Online ranges from very easy (all work up front, no exams) to chaotic late syllabus and wrong quiz answers.
Main concern
Organization and communication can collapse when materials drop late.
What students said
“Very easy class. He gives you all the assignments up front. No quizzes or exams for this class.”
“hes so unorganized and it made me fall behind. uploaded syllabus 5 days into the week with projects and assignments due the next day.”
“He will give you everything day one, due at the end of the semester.”
Exam style
Assessment centers on homework and cert-oriented exams with helpful in-class clues.
Assessment risk
Standard
58/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person exams align with cert prep; students say x x x x if you pay attention.
“Mr. Kami give you good clues as to what you may see on the exam.”
“He did a good job preparing me for cert!”
One easy online section had no quizzes or exams; another reported wrong quiz answers and late materials.
“No quizzes or exams for this class.”
“his answers on quizzes were wrong”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Mr. Kami is tough, but fair. You have to do the work, but if you follow the recommendations you should be able to get an "A" in this class.”
“He's also very kind, professional, clear, brief & organized.”
“Lots of work, but learned a lot. x x”
“Grading is hard, but always gives you a 2nd chance to make it up even though he says he won't.”
“Best Cisco instructor I've ever had!”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
16
Recent reviews read by the AI
16
Lifetime ratings
68/100
Evidence confidence
Sixteen reviews with consistent in-person themes, but many are older (2014) and online sample is only three.
Inside 16 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
7 reported outcomes
A+ 1 · A 5
B 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values