AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Terry Esparza

HLTHOCC059 · HLTHOCC053 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and can tolerate missing grades and zero communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnreachableSlow gradingUnprofessionalInconsistentAvoid if grade-critical
  • Students repeatedly report unanswered emails and administration also struggling to reach her.
  • Grades are late, missing, or .
  • One outlier loved her personality, but the .
  • ],
  • suitableStudentType
  • Self Taught Pro
  • overallSuggestion
  • Avoid unless you have no alternative and can tolerate missing grades and zero communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some students report As, but grade changes, delays, and a D show the grade outcome is unreliable.

As.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Difficulty ratings are low; complaints target communication and .

Online and as manageable when contact works.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Most reviews that .

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Almost all students warn others to choose a different instructor for reliability.

Online is uniformly negative; in person has one fan and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and grade-changing complaints dominate the record.

Format shift

; online also reports grade changing.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and group projects exist, but the .

Format shift

Lots of .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students describe unprofessional, unstructured teaching and near-zero communication.

Format shift

One in-person review is glowing; the rest across formats are severe.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assignments and ; little detail is given about formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

grades and poor structure, with one highly positive personality review.

Main concern

Grades may never be submitted even when graduation depends on them.

What students said

“Grades were never submitted, and it's impossible to reach her.”
HLTHOCC053
“Extremely inconsistent and contradicts herself often.”
HLTHOCC053
“She is literally so cool and funny loveeee her queen”
HLTHOCC053

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews slam nonresponse, , and unprofessional grade changes.

Main concern

Cannot get replies or timely grades, which risks program progress.

What students said

“This professor is completely unprofessional!! It is extremely difficult to get in contact with her.”
HLTHOCC053
“ .”
HLTHOCC053
“Very unprofessional with grade changing”
HLTHOCC059

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; risk is administrative grade failure more than proctoring.

Assignment grading delaysUnclear grade process

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize grades never submitted and .

Missing final gradesInconsistent grading
“Grades were never submitted, and it's impossible to reach her.”
HLTHOCC053
“Profesor is not thorough and timely with .”
HLTHOCC053

Online

Online reviews focus on nonresponse and .

Slow assignment gradingUnreliable contact
“Took her long .”
HLTHOCC053
“Very unprofessional with grade changing”
HLTHOCC059

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If your graduation or program progress depends on getting a grade for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (3 online, 3 in person), highlighting contact failure and grade risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚨 Communication Failure

15/100

“It is extremely difficult to get in contact with her.”

📉 Recommendation

18/100

“Choose another professor if .”

⚖️

22/100

“Grades were never submitted, and it's impossible to reach her.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Extremely inconsistent and contradicts herself often.”

Theme 1

📵 About Communication

  • impossible to reach her
  • Even the administration can't get in contact with her

Theme 2

📝

  • Grades were never submitted
  • Very unprofessional with grade changing
  • Took her long .

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality (outlier)

  • She is literally so cool and funny loveeee her queen
  • Amazing lectures
  • Caring

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only six reviews, but they are recent and highly consistent on communication and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

HLTHOCC0535 reviews
HLTHOCC0591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2