AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Juliana Howe

MATH241 · MATH245 · MATH115 · MATH260 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can self-study math and exploit practice exams; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardSweet but ConfusingPractice Exams Match TestsTest Heavy MathPartial CreditHomework Often Not Collected
  • Students widely agree she is kind and wants you to pass, with .
  • some say she breaks math down; .
  • Grade path is fair if you attend, use practice tests, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

As are realistic with practice exams, partial credit, and sometimes uncollected homework, but .

Online review is more grade-friendly; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content difficulty is moderate to high depending on course, with several difficulty 4-5 ratings in higher classes.

Online MATH241 felt easier; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is mandatory or that skipping means you will not pass.

; most in-person reviews treat presence as required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

About two-thirds would take her again for care and fair testing support, while .

; in-person opinions split more.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

, and occasional full HW credit keep grading reasonably friendly.

Format shift

Online policies sound slightly more flexible than some in-person reports.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

but is sometimes not collected; and self-study.

Format shift

Both formats mention low HW collection frequency.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Kind and helpful outside class, yet lecture clarity is inconsistent and .

Format shift

Online student called her sweet; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and final dominate (often 60 percent exams plus 30 percent final) with .

Format shift

Online review gives exact weights that match many in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and test-centered; practice exams help, but many students find board work and .

Main concern

style and occasional unclear study targets hurt students weak in math.

What students said

“She is the .”
MATH241
“If and show up for your class then you are guaranteed an A.”
MATH115
“ .”
MATH245

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single online MATH241 review describes recorded lectures, , and full HW credit when exams go well.

Main concern

Only one online review limits confidence in format-specific patterns.

What students said

“Allows cheat sheets. Do the hw, it'll help. Overall, she's a really sweet professor.”
MATH241

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams closely follow practice materials, often allow aids or partial credit, and , though still feel tough for some.

Practice Exams Match Real ExamsCheat Sheets Allowed OnlineDrop Lowest ExamPartial Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

to exams and partial credit is common, with no clear Lockdown Browser claims.

Practice Tests IdenticalPartial CreditTest HeavyNo Clear Proctoring Software Mentioned
“ .”
MATH245
“she gives you partial credit for your work and .”
MATH241
“ ”
MATH241

Online

Online MATH241 allowed cheat sheets, dropped lowest of four exams, and weighted final at 30 percent.

Cheat SheetsDrop Lowest ExamExam Review Day BeforeRecorded Lectures
“4 exams worth 60% but . Final is 30%. She does an . Allows cheat sheets.”
MATH241

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If and show up for your class then you are guaranteed an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews (1 online, 13 in-person), highlighting care, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🧪

80/100

“ .”

😵 Lecture Clarity

35/100

“She is the .”

❤️ Student Care

78/100

“I have never had such teacher who completely cares about her students passing.”

👍 Recommendation Split

64/100

“Overall, she's a really sweet professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really breaks it down to make it more digestible
  • You are better off going by the notes of the text book.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Allows cheat sheets
  • guaranteed an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • really sweet and cares about her students
  • Nicest teacher I ever had.
  • She is a good instructor. She really tries.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews with a long time span and recurring themes, but only one online review and mixed grade reporting reduce certainty.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2419 reviews
MATH1153 reviews
MATH2451 review
MATH2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3