AI Rate Professor

English

Bernard Goldberg

ENG204 · HISTORY27 · ENG203 · ENGLIT · JEW026 · JEWIS006 · ENGLI4017 · JEW101 · JEW027 · ENG102 · MANY · ENG127 · ENG206 · ENG205 · ENGLISH205 · ENGLISH206 · ENG103 · ENG26 · ENGL206 · ENG233 · ENG203204 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want a demanding literature or writing mentor and can absorb tough grading; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPolarizing MentorGPA RiskWriting PuristAvoid Warnings
  • some call him an excellent rigorous and unclear standards.
  • Getting an A , and matching his standards; effort alone may not protect your GPA.
  • Serious and hostile classroom remarks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Many call him a ; an A usually takes extreme effort and still is not guaranteed.

Nearly all ; the one online review only notes passing.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Literature and writing courses are repeatedly described as hard subjects with and strict standards.

Difficulty ; the online note also rates difficulty high.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

, with success tied more to completing the work.

; online has little attendance detail.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Official take-again is 0% and many students urge avoiding him despite a subset of glowing older reviews.

Recommendation is mixed historically but recent and high-stakes .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Tags and , and GPA risk.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and careful essay writing are common.

Format shift

Workload complaints are mainly in-person; .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and passion; others report confusion, closed-mindedness, and hostility.

Format shift

In-person experience is highly polarized; the single online review is lukewarm-negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment centers on essays, reading, quizzes or tests, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention reading and assessments; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews swing from life-changing English mentor to GPA destroyer with and .

Main concern

, and highly polarizing classroom climate.

What students said

“ . There is a difference between a and abusive.”
ENG102
“He is passionate about graceful writing & willing to help - be precise & he will answer within 24 h.”
ENG103
“He is an incredible teacher! The BEST! You have to work very hard, but you will learn a great deal.”
ENGLIT

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review found him rigid and narrow-minded, with interest mainly in the assigned reading.

Main concern

His-way-or-the-highway style with little value for student opinion.

What students said

“His way or the highway. and throw it out the window.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and major work often require close textual analysis and matching his lecture standards rather than open-ended ease.

Essay AnalysisLine-by-Line ExamsTest HeavyReading-Based Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams that expect precise analysis and can feel harsh.

Essay HeavyAnalytical ExamsTough Grading
“ . Instead, you had to analyze everthing line by line.”
ENG205
“Lots of ”
ENG102

Online

Reviews do .

Assigned Reading Focus
“ my interest in the class.”
ENG103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . There is a difference between a and abusive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Difficult class, excellent teacher.”

⚠️ GPA Risk

26/100

“This man resents hardwork, talent and honesty and will RUIN your GPA.”

✍️ Writing Standards

70/100

“ ... Read material, apply it & take time to carefully write your essays you'll be fine.”

👎 Recommendation

34/100

“Horrible teacher. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is passionate about graceful writing & willing to help
  • His way or the highway
  • makes the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A class
  • I barely got an A in this class. He is a
  • You won't learn anything but will have your GPA destroyed

Theme 3

⚠️ About Trust & Fairness

  • this professor lied and pretended that I hadn't
  • Instructions 4 assignment not clear

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews across many years with detailed narratives and consistent polarization support a high-confidence mixed portrait.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ENG2054 reviews
ENG1023 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
ENG2062 reviews
JEW1012 reviews
Show 17 more courses
1031 review
ENG1271 review
ENG2031 review
ENG2032041 review
ENG2041 review
ENG2331 review
ENG261 review
ENGL2061 review
ENGLI40171 review
ENGLISH2051 review
ENGLISH2061 review
ENGLIT1 review
HISTORY271 review
JEW0261 review
JEW0271 review
JEWIS0061 review
MANY1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values