AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Ruth Monroe

CHDEV002 · CHILDDEV001 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will read thoroughly and submit exactly as instructed; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardRead EverythingTough on Early ProjectsNot Tech SavvyClear When Online WorksNo Exceptions
  • Class is often easy if you read carefully and .
  • Online and weak email or tech support.
  • When structure is clear, some students report .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

68/100

Several students say the class is easy with reading and doing work as told, though early mistakes can be costly.

; online includes both easy A and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Child development content is repeatedly called easy when students complete the reading and assignments.

Both formats describe beginner-level material with reading as the main requirement.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

as not mandatory.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Would-take-again is about 60%, with and .

Online recommendation is weaker due to communication issues; in-person is more mixed-to-positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some call her not a if instructions are followed; and no exceptions on early work.

Format shift

; one online summer course felt fair.

Workload

Light

62/100

Workload centers on reading and .

Format shift

; reading volume still matters.

Teaching experience

Average

44/100

Clear criteria and , while others report nonresponse and .

Format shift

Teaching ; online tech friction hurts experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

At least one section had no tests and graded only on submitted work; projects and reading tasks dominate.

Format shift

Online CHDEV002 explicitly reports no tests; other sections still emphasize projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person the course is easy with reading, but and she makes no exceptions.

Main concern

High-stakes early tasks with no exceptions if you start poorly.

What students said

“This class is extremely easy if you read!!! Key word Read!!”
CHILDDEV001
“This class was easy you just have to read the material and pay attention to the assignments given.”
CHILDDEV001

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews split between a and strong warnings about unanswered emails and .

Main concern

Poor tech support and .

What students said

“ !!! If you like to get credit for all of your work! She is not tech savvy.”
CHILDDEV001
“Ruth Monroe didn't answer my emails along with .”
CHILDDEV001
“ so it was all based on the work you turned in.”
CHDEV002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment often leans on projects and submitted work rather than high-stakes proctored exams.

No Tests in Some SectionsAssignment-BasedReading Quizzes PossibleProject Heavy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize reading and .

High-Point Early ProjectsReading Required
“it's one of .. She makes no exceptions whatsoever.”
CHILDDEV001

Online

Online evidence includes a no-test assignment-based course; reviews .

No TestsWork SubmissionClear Grading Criteria
“ so it was all based on the work you turned in.”
CHDEV002
“She is not a as you are told and you will do good.”
CHDEV002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is extremely easy if you read!!! Key word Read!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting reading-based ease and online support gaps. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“She is not a as you are told and you will do good.”

💻 Tech Support Issues

25/100

“She is not tech savvy and if not respond well.”

📖 Reading Requirement

80/100

“This class was easy you just have to read the material and pay attention to the assignments given.”

📧 Communication

20/100

“Ruth Monroe didn't answer my emails along with .”

Theme 1

📖 About Course Ease

  • extremely easy if you read
  • easy you just have to read the material
  • just do the work as you are told and you will do good

Theme 2

⚠️ About Online Friction

  • She is not tech savvy
  • didn't answer my emails

Theme 3

📌

  • She makes no exceptions whatsoever
  • it's one of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews limit confidence, though comments are recent and somewhat detailed across formats.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHILDDEV0014 reviews
CHDEV0021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values