AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Irina Gromova

MATH245 · MATH115 · MTH12B · MATH126 · MATH125 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can handle a strong accent and collected.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong Russian accentStudy guide equals testPartial credit givenHomework often uncollectedPolarizing lectures
  • Thick accent is the most repeated complaint and can block understanding for some students.
  • and she often gives partial credit and .
  • , so grade .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and partial credit helps, but and some call them tough.

; one online review says you should be fine if you study.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is typical for intermediate algebra or stats, not softened by the instructor for weaker students.

In-person reviews dominate difficulty comments; the single online review found material simplified well.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, while others warn skipping means you will not pass.

Attendance comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Roughly half the and care, while the other half urge students to run because of accent and attitude.

Online review is fully positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Partial credit, dropped low exam, and study-guide alignment help, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

but not collected, so daily busywork is low if .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Knowledge and patience are praised by many, yet accent, sarcasm, and speed produce many harsh reviews.

Format shift

Online sample is tiny and positive; in-person sample is large and mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and little collected homework put most weight on tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fair tests, while others slam the accent, sarcasm, and fast pace.

Main concern

Strong accent plus occasional sarcasm and speed make lectures hard for some students to follow.

What students said

“Do the study guide she gives out before test (it is exactly what will be on the ).”
MATH125
“Horrible instructor, ... .”
MATH125
“She has a very thick accent. However, she is very detailed in .”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single recent online review is strongly positive: , and solid results if you study and attend.

Main concern

Only one online review, so experience may not generalize.

What students said

“I was scared to fail this class since I'm horrible at math but she made everything simple. and flexible.”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; study guides closely match tests and partial credit is common.

Study guide matches testPartial creditLowest exam droppedHomework rarely collected

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and often drop the lowest score; homework is frequently uncollected.

Study guide matches testPartial creditLowest exam droppedNo collected homework
“Do the study guide she gives out before test (it is exactly what will be on the ).”
MATH125
“Gives partial credit on problems depending on how much of your work is correct.”
MATH125

Online

One online , and office help without detailed proctoring policy.

Lecture-based support
“Just study, go to her lectures, write notes, do the homework, and you should be fine.”
MATH125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the study guide she gives out before test (it is exactly what will be on the ). Gives partial credit on problems depending on how much of your work is correct.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews (mostly older in-person), highlighting accent, study guides, and polarized care. Credibility rating: Medium.

🗣️ Accent Barrier

40/100

“This lady is a HORRIBLE teacher! Strong accent is an understatment, and she has the nerve to get an attitude when you can't understand what she's saying.”

📘 Study-Guide Exams

70/100

“Do the study guide she gives out before test (it is exactly what will be on the ).”

⚖️ Polarized Teaching

55/100

“This is a difficult class but its not due to the instructor. She really wants us to understand and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very detailed in .
  • Very fast when it comes to teaching. Blink and you'll miss everything.
  • she is willing to work with you.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She has 5 exams with lowest score dropped and .
  • Her tests are easier than the hw.(which .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and flexible.
  • Can be very sarcastic when you ask a question.
  • she really cares about her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews exist but most are old (2004-2012) with sparse grade data and only one online review, lowering reliability for current sections.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH12514 reviews
MATH2452 reviews
12514881 review
MATH1151 review
MATH1261 review
Show 1 more courses
MTH12B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values