AI Rate Professor

Communication

Iris Maybruck

COMM151 · COM101 · COMM101 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid Maybruck for COMM101 unless you have no choice and will follow her outline format exactly.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderNitpicky outlinesUnclear assignmentsPoor communicationAvoid if possible
  • Most students call her the and warn others not to enroll.
  • and pedantic, including large point cuts for tiny outline format issues.
  • Assignments and , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

An A is possible only by mirroring her outline format exactly; many students report Ds, Fs, and .

; online reviews also report failure and confusion.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and pop quizzes rather than advanced theory.

Both formats feel hard because of grading and organization, not content depth alone.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and others optional, with mixed structured answers.

; online comments often say not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly all and punitive grading.

and in person; only one in-person review is enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and large deductions for fonts, underlines, and minor outline details define the experience.

Format shift

Harsh nitpicking is clearest in in-person COMM101 comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Speeches, many papers, outlines, and .

Format shift

Lots of homework and .

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students say she does not , and communicates poorly.

Format shift

Both formats attack teaching quality; online adds Canvas incompetence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grade hinges on speeches and outlines with .

Format shift

Speech and ; online still centers assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person COMM101 is dominated , and disorganization despite one path to an A via copying her outline style.

Main concern

Massive deductions for tiny formatting details and .

What students said

“She took 75 points out of 300 because the title was not underlined.”
COMM101
“ and never goes over them in class.”
COMM101
“Just look at how she did her outline… copy it but with your topic… Boom A”
COMM101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are confusing on Canvas with , and failed grades reported.

Main concern

She and fails to teach speech writing clearly.

What students said

“I didn't learn anything because .”
COM101
“she doesn't .”
COMM151

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk centers on picky speech and exams.

Pop quizzesSpeech outlinesFew graded itemsHarsh format deductions

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and extremely strict outline or .

Pop quizzesOutline format nitpickingSpeeches
“Beware of pop quizzes”
COMM101
“She took 75 points out of 300 because the title was not underlined.”
COMM101

Online

Online reviews ; they stress confusion, Canvas issues, and harsh outcomes.

Canvas confusionUnclear assignments
“She was very unprofessional and don't .”
COM101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you absolutely have to.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (2 online, 7 in and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Overall Recommendation

12/100

“ unless you absolutely have to.”

📉

15/100

“She took 75 points out of 300 because the title was not underlined.”

😕

16/100

“ and never goes over them in class.”

Theme 1

📝

  • nitpicks and takes off marks for completely irrelevant things
  • title was not underlined

Theme 2

🗣️ About Teaching Quality

  • I learned nothing in this class
  • doesn't know she is doing at all

Theme 3

💻

  • doesn't
  • Very

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed and highly consistent negative reviews from 2016-2022 form a .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

COMM1016 reviews
COM1012 reviews
COMM1511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1