AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Corey Williams

AJ2 · ADM004 · ADM001 · ADMJUS004 · ADMINOFJ001 · AJ1 · AJ0134 · AJADM · ADJ001 · W0137 · ADMJUS1 · AJ002 · ADMJUS001 · AJ001 · ADMIN0134 · ADM1040 · AJAJ · ADM002 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can self-study the book and handle blunt feedback; avoid if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingHilarious lecturesTough graderMust read the bookMixed communication
  • Experience is highly split between entertaining lectures and rude or .
  • , and showing up is often enough for a solid grade.
  • Online sections draw more complaints about disorganization and weak teaching support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students say show up and , but and tough grading.

paper standards; online is easier content-wise but .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Material is not advanced if you read, yet portfolios, group work, and .

Online difficulty varies widely; in person most often sits around moderate with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others list it optional.

; online reports are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Roughly half love the energy and humor while others warn of rudeness and .

In-person reviews are split; online reviews lean more negative on support and organization.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

yet harsh on tiny instruction misses and late work.

Format shift

Recent in-person AJ2 comments are especially harsh; some older sections felt easy.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reading, discussions, group projects, and portfolios create steady work without being universally overwhelming.

Format shift

A few online sections had very few assignments; and portfolio work.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Entertaining and knowledgeable for some, unapproachable and .

Format shift

In-person energy is often praised; online communication quality is weaker on average.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and timed online tests depending on section.

Format shift

Online leans toward discussions and quizzes; in person adds speeches of police culture, portfolios, and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is often funny and engaging, but , and late or imperfect work.

Main concern

and interpersonal friction can offset the entertaining lectures.

What students said

“That egotistical a-hole is truly awful. He gives snarky responses and zero chance to fix mistakes.”
AJ2
“if you just show up to class and do the to get an A in the class.”
AJ002

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews , and engagement despite some easy A paths.

Main concern

Weak modules, delayed clarity, and condescending tone in several online reports.

What students said

“Corey was completely unorganized, not engaged with students, seemed bothered by any questions asked”
ADM002
“ . Basically you are on your own in this class.”
ADMJUS004

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

online quizzes and occasional surprise quizzes in class.

Book-based testsTimed online testsSurprise quizzesGroup projectsPortfolio

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person expects , and possible pop quizzes.

Book-based testsTimed online testsSurprise quizzesGroup projectsPortfolio
“ . They are timed but not very long.”
ADJ001
“He hands out surprise quizzes the first 5 min. of class that ”
ADMINOFJ001

Online

Online sections emphasize reading-based exams, discussions, and .

Reading-based examsDiscussion boardsQuizzes
“Online class you will have to read to pass the ”
ADM001
“ and refused to provide the test answers so students could see what they got wrong.”
ADM002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, if you just show up to class and do the to get an A in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews with High credibility, capturing the strong split between entertaining lectures and harsh support experiences.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Williams is a funny guy and has great lectures at times but when it comes down to asking questions about projects or due dates its a nightmare.”

⚖️

38/100

“Miss and it's a zero.”

📚 Read or Struggle

58/100

“ . Questions from tests & quizzes come straight from the book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's quite entertaining. He reminds me of a preacher and he's quite funny.
  • He is a great teacher. He teaches discipline and respect.

Theme 2

📉 About Negatives

  • . He's terrible with his students and doesn't communicate with you.
  • Class is easy but the professor can be rude and is not very understanding which can have an effect on your grade.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Do all the homework and turn it in on-time and you wont have a problem with getting an A in the class.
  • Not an easy "A", but he prepares you for your career and higher education.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews over many years with rich detail and .

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ADJ0018 reviews
ADM0014 reviews
ADMJUS13 reviews
AJ23 reviews
ADM0042 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ADMINOFJ0012 reviews
AJ12 reviews
01341 review
ADM0021 review
ADM10401 review
ADMIN01341 review
ADMJUS0011 review
ADMJUS0041 review
AJ0011 review
AJ0021 review
AJ01341 review
AJADM1 review
AJAJ1 review
W01371 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values