AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Junko Forbes

STATISTICS227 · MATH227 · M227 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Good pick for stats if you will attend and use her help; expect and possible software cost.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringAccessible outside classHelpful videosTest correctionsTest heavy
  • , and strong review videos.
  • Course is real statistics work with and and accessibility.
  • One sharp negative , and required paid software.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and help raise the floor, but and the class is not described as a free A.

and solid grades; in person splits between fair help and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Statistics content is inherently tricky even when she clarifies it well.

Both formats call stats complicated but teachable with her support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and include skip-class warnings.

Online and in as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Four of five would take again, citing care and clarity, .

Online reviews are positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Corrections and willingness to fix quiz errors help, but .

Format shift

; one in-person review calls her a .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Homework and tests are real; not overwhelming for everyone but clearly more than light.

Format shift

; others do not dwell on volume.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Majority describe amazing or highly helpful teaching, patience, and care, with one contrasting private-experience complaint.

Format shift

Online videos get special praise; in-person reviews are more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and and homework support.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is mostly seen as fair and ; one student found her privately impatient and exam-centric.

Main concern

and , and software fees frustrate some.

What students said

“Statistics is very complicated but she made it easier to understand. She does everything in her power to help you do well”
MATH227
“her course is not the easiest thing in the world but she is extremely fair and receptive”
M227
“she DOES NOT CARE how much effort you work on, all she cares is what scores you get from the exams.”
STATISTICS227

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students like her availability, joke-filled lectures, and especially her videos, with .

Main concern

Pace can be slow for faster students and .

What students said

“Her videos are AMAZING. . She is very patient, and caring.”
MATH227
“Sometimes the because she hand-makes the ”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and review help; no clear proctoring details.

Test correctionsExam heavyHandmade quizzesReview sessionsMultiple choice

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In ; one student says only exam scores matter.

Test heavyReview sessionsExam focused
“Her review sessions are so helpful.”
MATH227
“all she cares is what scores you get from the exams.”
STATISTICS227

Online

; quizzes are multiple choice and occasionally need key fixes.

Test correctionsMultiple choice quizzesVideo support
“ .”
MATH227
“Sometimes the because she hand-makes the ”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Forbes is AMAZING! I took during Spring, Statistics is very complicated but she made it easier to understand. She does everything in her power to help you do well, and cares about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (2 online, 3 in person), highlighting help-oriented teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Her videos are AMAZING. . She is very patient, and caring.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“ive have professor forbes before and i really found her to be one of the good ones who really helped me out”

⚠️

40/100

“she DOES NOT CARE how much effort you work on, all she cares is what scores you get from the exams.”

💻 Online Support

85/100

“I was nervous about taking this class online as I had never done it before. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mrs. Forbes is always making jokes, which makes the lectures entertaining.
  • She does everything in her power to help you do well
  • she is extremely fair and receptive

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • her course is not the easiest thing in the world
  • Lots of

Theme 3

💵 About Costs & Access

  • she will ask you to pay software for her class cost somewhere around $70

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews total and one detailed negative outlier.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2273 reviews
M2271 review
STATISTICS2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1