AI Rate Professor

Anatomy

Fatemeh Gandomi

PHYS001 · ANATOMY001 · PHYSIOL001 · PHYSIO001 · PHYSIOSUM2020 · PHYSIOSUM15 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Only take her if you and heavy memorization; expect mixed support and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOrganized Study GuidesTest HeavyStrict ProctoringExtra Credit ContestedPolarizing
  • Supporters praise organization, study guides, empathy, and dropped low scores.
  • Critics report limited class meetings, harsh timed Proctorio exams, no answer review, and misleading .
  • Physiology and anatomy require heavy memorization; grades often land B/C range.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

, and many B/C grades mean an A requires strong effort; is often folded into the curve.

Both online and ; online adds Proctorio timing stress.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Anatomy and physiology demand lots of memorization and lecture-heavy content.

Online and ; summer accelerated online is especially hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

while several note attendance not required or sparse live meetings.

; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About half rave about organization and care; and .

Polarization appears in both formats with similar split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough grader and sometimes counted into totals so it feels hollow.

Format shift

and in-person physiology reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and lots of memorization keep the load high.

Format shift

Homework and lecture load mentioned across formats.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and unhelpful for others.

Format shift

In-person has both glowing and scathing voices; online also splits hard.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

; test-heavy is a recurring tag.

Format shift

Both formats center timed exams; online adds Proctorio.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and ; others say few live classes, random test questions, and no exam review.

Main concern

and inconsistent class availability.

What students said

“She was the . Material was available one week before the course and provides the .”
PHYSIOSUM2020
“ and were told multiple times not to ask questions about the study guide, which wasn't effective for the exam.”
PHYSIOL001

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews split between success with study guides and anger over , and no review of missed questions.

Main concern

Strict Proctorio timing and inability to .

What students said

“At first we had 34 min to take the test (34 questions) but then she changed it to 25 min. Ridiculous rules when taking the though its already proctored using Proctorio.”
PHYS001
“ and amazing study guide I was successful!”
PHYSIOSUM2020

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and students cannot review wrong answers.

ProctorioTimed ExamsNo Answer ReviewWeekly Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and remote hybrid tests are strict; students report no review of wrong answers and random questions; cheating is policed.

No Answer ReviewStrict On TestsWeekly Exams
“Didnt show the correct answers after everyone took the test. Never know what you did right and what you answered wrong.”
PHYSIO001
“Because of remote learning she had to make sure nobody cheats, that was very understandable.”
PHYSIOSUM2020

Online

Online exams use Proctorio with shortened time limits and .

ProctorioShort Timed TestsNo View Wrong Answers
“Ridiculous rules when taking the though its already proctored using Proctorio. Doesnt let you view what you got wrong.”
PHYS001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“At first we had 34 min to take the test (34 questions) but then she changed it to 25 min. Ridiculous rules when taking the though its already proctored using Proctorio.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (3 online, 6 in and polarized teaching views. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Split

50/100

“Dr. Gandomi is nothing but amazing and caring!”

📝

28/100

“Doesnt let you view what you got wrong. Probably watches your exam which is why it takes long to get your score back.”

📚 Organization Praise

75/100

“She was the . Material was available one week before the course and provides the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and caring professor
  • and were told multiple times not to ask questions about the study guide
  • If Anatomy is intimidating fear not with Professor Gandomi

Theme 2

📈

  • -
  • Gives but included in the so it doesnt make sense
  • ! Amazing!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews from 2019-2020 with and ; modest sample and short time window limit certainty.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ANATOMY0012 reviews
PHYSIOL0012 reviews
PHYSIOSUM20202 reviews
PHYS0011 review
PHYSIO0011 review
Show 1 more courses
PHYSIOSUM151 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1