AI Rate Professor

English

Linda Watts

ENG103 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will attend, do the homework, and communicate when you need help; avoid if you want a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkUnderstanding if you tryMandatory attendanceRespectedSometimes disorganized
  • Two of as educated, enthusiastic, and fair if you try.
  • Expect a decent amount of homework and reading in ENG103.
  • One review warns of schedule changes, heavy work, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One reported A and comments say showing effort and talking to her helps, but homework and a .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range with reading and .

Only in-person ENG103 comments available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Two reviews list attendance as mandatory and warn that .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Two enthusiastic yes recommendations outweigh one clear .

All recommendations are from in-person students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Understanding if you try, yet and .

Format shift

In-person only; mixed signals between understanding and tough.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Multiple students say she gives a lot of homework and reading, though not impossible.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Described as amazing, respected, enthusiastic, and educated, with one disorganization complaint.

Format shift

Positive majority is in-person ENG103 only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize homework and showing effort more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All three reviews are in-person ENG103: two praise her teaching and understanding nature despite homework, while one found the .

Main concern

and occasional schedule disorganization.

What students said

“Amazing teacher. Very educated and if you listen to her teachings you might actually learn something.”
ENG103
“Great teacher, she does give alot of homework so be prepared.”
ENG103
“ . She changed schedules a lot and gave us a lot of assignments.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students ; , and class organization.

“She does give a decent amount of homework but it's not super difficult you just have to show her you're at least trying”
ENG103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing teacher. Very educated and if you listen to her teachings you might actually learn something.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person , and organization. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Very enthusiastic and serious about her job. ”

📚

30/100

“she does give alot of homework so be prepared.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

40/100

“ . She changed schedules a lot and gave us a lot of assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher. Very educated
  • Very enthusiastic and serious about her job.
  • Hilarious

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it's not super difficult you just have to show her you're at least trying
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Theme 3

📅

  • If you wont be so she wont give you a 0.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2018-2020 limits reliability despite recent dates and fairly detailed comments.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1033 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values