AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Julio Herrera

MATH125 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle a heavy MATH125 workload and ; online support looks inconsistent.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots of homeworkMandatory attendanceHelpful when presentInconsistent online supportExtra credit available
  • and helpful, but workload is heavy with no late work
  • Online students report weak teaching presence and unanswered emails
  • He sometimes softens grades with and dropped quizzes yet still feels tough

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and lots of and no easy-A language.

; the in-person review focuses on heavy work more than easy grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings are high and students stress constant study plus a heavy online and .

Both formats describe challenge; while online stresses self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

and in-person MATH125 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

One glowing in-person take-again contrasts with a and a middling third review.

In-person recommendation is positive; online recommendation is split and includes a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and dropped lowest quiz help some students, but tough-grader tags and a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention and ; in-person stresses clear criteria without leniency claims.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and a heavy online component.

Format shift

Heavy workload is explicit in both online and in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

and helpful, but online students report little teaching and poor email response.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised; online teaching support is strongly criticized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests all matter, with Saturday testing mentioned online.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly questions then Saturday tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH125 has clear helpful lectures but a , and .

Main concern

Heavy workload especially in fast-paced ITV formats.

What students said

“-A lot of homework! -No late work! - ! -STUDY! STUDY! STUDY! *If you do ITV (fast-paced) take this class alone! The workload is heavy!”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online 8-week MATH125 is work-heavy with mixed support; one student felt untaught and ignored, another noted and grade consideration.

Main concern

Slow or missing instructor responses and a sense that the class does not teach enough.

What students said

“I have never taken a class where someone doesn't teach. He never answered my email about questions he didn't answer in class. ”
MATH125
“There was a lot of work in the online component. I had a difficult time in this class . Prof gave ”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and tests; reviews do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use.

Lots of homeworkQuizzesSaturday testsExtra creditNo late work

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review stresses lots of homework, no late work, and .

Lots of homeworkNo late workClear grading criteria
“-A lot of homework! -No late work! - !”
MATH125

Online

Online MATH125 includes a heavy online component, quizzes, and and dropped lowest quiz for some; proctoring tools are not clearly proven.

Heavy online componentQuizzesSaturday testsExtra creditDropped lowest quiz
“The Syllabus states that he suppose to answer any questions you have for next week and .”
MATH125
“Prof gave and a lot of consideration such as dropping lowest quiz and considering participation for the .”
MATH125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have never taken a class where someone doesn't teach. He never answered my email about questions he didn't answer in class. ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting heavy workload and the . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Reality

22/100

“The workload is heavy!”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ ”

🎁 Grade Softeners

55/100

“Prof gave and a lot of consideration such as ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I have never taken a class where someone doesn't teach

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A lot of homework
  • I had a difficult time in this class

Theme 3

📅

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • If
  • There was a lot of work in the online component

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews from 2017-2018 give useful detail but split sharply by format, so overall confidence stays medium.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1253 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1