AI Rate Professor

Dental Hygiene

Lisa Kamibayashi

DH · DH88 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you need her section and ; document expectations early.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeable clinicianUnfair favorites riskClear feedback when fairPolarizing fairness
  • Strong clinical knowledge and
  • Serious fairness concerns about favorites and
  • ; overall experience is mixed across years

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Multiple A grades appear, but and shifting rules mean an A still depends on meeting her preferences carefully.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings span easy to very hard, with clinical PE and presentation standards that .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

At least one review states attendance was mandatory, with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Some call her the best DH professor while others warn about rudeness and , so fit depends on fairness tolerance.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and fairness are praised by some, while others report favorites and inconsistent rules.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; difficulty spikes appear tied to clinical and presentation standards.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Strong knowledge and helpful coaching for some students, undercut by reports of confusion and discouraging tone.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention presentations, PE skills, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person DH courses show both excellent teaching praise and sharp complaints about favoritism and rule changes.

Main concern

and discouraging feedback for some students.

What students said

“She is the . Extremely knowledgeable and great teaching skills.”
DH88
“Students that she likes will pass PE's even if they do major mistakes.”
DH
“One of the only teachers in the DH program and treated all students equally, no favorites.”
DH88

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe proctored written exams; assessment centers on presentations and clinical performance evaluation.

Presentation gradingClinical PE evaluation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize presentations and .

Presentation gradingClinical PE evaluation
“Can be unfair grading your presentations, again she has preferences for some students.”
DH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the . Extremely knowledgeable and great teaching skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2017, highlighting teaching praise versus fairness complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎓 Teaching Knowledge

68/100

“Extremely knowledgeable and great teaching skills.”

⚖️ Fairness Concerns

48/100

“Students that she likes will pass PE's even if they do major mistakes.”

🤝 Equal Treatment Praise

70/100

“treated all students equally, no favorites.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • Extremely knowledgeable and great teaching skills
  • Very helpful and respectful

Theme 2

⚖️

  • preferences for some students

Theme 3

😕 About Student Experience Risks

  • Can be rude and discourage students easily
  • listened to problems and came up with solutions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews spanning 2009-2017 with detailed but polarized comments reduce confidence despite useful specifics.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DH882 reviews
DH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values