AI Rate Professor

Business

Steven Gonsoski

BUS101 · COS901 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can stay current on heavy software work and tolerate uneven teaching quality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy WorkloadKeep Up Or Fall BehindMixed TeachingBusiness Software FocusPolarizing
  • Workload is heavy but doable if you never fall behind
  • Teaching quality is sharply mixed from excellent to unusable
  • Passing is possible with consistent effort, but A grades are not highlighted

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Reported grades are B and C- and students stress constant work just to pass, not easy top marks.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings run high and students describe a lot of software work that is easy to fall behind on.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

Reviews that .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

One strong keep-up-and-pass review is offset by a flat statement that he does not know how to teach.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Do-all-work-to-pass tone with mid grades reported rather than free A's or harsh failures.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students emphasize a lot of ongoing software work and the risk of falling behind.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Ratings range from 5 to 1 with praise for workload clarity and harsh claims of inability to teach.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments , and PowerPoint.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Reviews split between a workable heavy-work pass path and outright claims he cannot teach.

Main concern

Heavy continuous workload plus highly uneven teaching quality.

What students said

“A lot of work, do all work you will pass. Not tough just need to keep up and not fall behind.”
COS901
“this teacher does not know how to teach, period...”
BUS101
“Daily life comes into play and mistakes or misunderstandings on any of the types of software programs provided: .”
8460

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on continuous software work .

Software AssignmentsKeep-Up Workload

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize software program work and not .

Software AssignmentsContinuous Work
“A lot of work, do all work you will pass. Not tough just need to keep up and not fall behind.”
COS901
“mistakes or misunderstandings on any of the types of software programs provided: .”
8460

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A lot of work, do all work you will pass. Not tough just need to keep up and not fall behind.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting workload and mixed teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“A lot of work, do all work you will pass. Not tough just need to keep up and not fall behind.”

🎯 Teaching Split

42/100

“this teacher does not know how to teach, period...”

💻 Course Focus

55/100

“mistakes or misunderstandings on any of the types of software programs provided: .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • A lot of work, do all work you will pass.
  • Not tough just need to keep up and not fall behind.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • this teacher does not know how to teach, period...
  • Good man who loves his wife and daughter!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed but conflicting reviews spanning 2013-2016 give a usable but low-consistency picture.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

84601 review
BUS1011 review
COS9011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values