AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Cory Williams

AJ2 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-navigate messy materials and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing AssignmentsInaccurate SyllabusHarsh GraderPortfolio Template Issues
  • Only one old review paints a very poor teaching experience.
  • Syllabus and portfolio templates were inaccurate and .
  • as hard with little support for success.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Student explicitly says grades hard with and bad templates, so an A looks very costly.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Difficulty rated max and , so content felt extremely hard to navigate.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Quality was rated 1 with , and .

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Review states grades hard with no positive grade outcome reported.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, but portfolio and .

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Inaccurate syllabus and portfolio template plus confusing assignment explanations define a poor teaching experience.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments center on portfolio template and .

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person review describes inaccurate syllabus and , and hard grading.

Main concern

Unreliable course materials and .

What students said

“syllabus is not accurate, template for portfolio is not accurate. . Grades hard.”
AJ2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

“ . Grades hard.”
AJ2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“syllabus is not accurate, template for portfolio is not accurate. . Grades hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting material accuracy and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ .”

📝 Course Materials

15/100

“syllabus is not accurate, template for portfolio is not accurate.”

⚖️

15/100

“Grades hard.”

Theme 1

📚 About Materials & Clarity

  • syllabus is not accurate, template for portfolio is not accurate

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grades hard
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 5

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2015 with limited detail and no corroborating opinions.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AJ21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values