AI Rate Professor

Art

JA Harvey

MODERNART · ART400 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

fine if you want a if you want serious studio challenge.

Best fit · Easy A HunterMixed ReviewsAttendance-Based GradesLow CreativityEasy ProjectsInconsistent Experience
  • One student loved the class; another found it childish and unengaging.
  • .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

One A with moderate difficulty and another C where assignments were loosely enforced and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Projects described as arts-and-crafts level with low intellectual demand for college art.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and explicitly tied to the grade in the other.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

One strong praise and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Assignments were not strongly enforced and grades leaned on showing up.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

Projects felt light and unenforced rather than heavy studio work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Enjoyable for one student, uncreative and unengaging for another.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

one student thrived, another felt the class was a hangout with weak criteria and childish projects.

Main concern

and limited creative rigor.

What students said

“Great Instructor, really really enjoyed the class.”
MODERNART
“Teacher lacks creativity for being an art professor. It was very much arts/crafts and childish projects.”
ART400

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears project- and attendance-driven.

Attendance-linked gradingProject-based

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; and loosely enforced projects.

Attendance-linked gradingProject-based
“ . .”
ART400

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“class itself had great potential. Teacher lacks creativity for being an art professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2014-2015; credibility rating: Low.

🎨 Creative Depth

40/100

“It was very much arts/crafts and childish projects.”

📅

25/100

“ .”

👍 Enjoyment Split

50/100

“Great Instructor, really really enjoyed the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Instructor, really really enjoyed the class.
  • Teacher lacks creativity for being an art professor.
  • Mr. Harvey does not keep students interested.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • .
  • Mostly a hang out spot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews (2014-2015) with opposite tones and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART4001 review
MODERNART1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values