AI Rate Professor

Economics

G Montes

ECON1 · ECON001 · ECO1 · ECONOMIC001 · MICROECONOMICS · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you , and read the chapters.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTake-Home Quizzes MatterSarcastic HumorFlexible and HelpfulAttendance CriticalClear Analogies
  • , and show up to pass.
  • Most students find him funny, flexible, and .
  • One strongly negative review cites harsh classroom tone and intimidation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

, and cheat sheets help, but work and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Standard intro econ that rewards reading and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Students stress showing up; as essential to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and help despite one harsh outlier.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, and occasional cheat sheets support better grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, and but doable load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

and humor help most students, though classroom manner can feel sharp.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and in-class exams both matter, plus participation .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and participation with flexible help.

Main concern

A minority report unfriendly tone and bathroom or question policing.

What students said

“2 Things you must do in his class... be there and do ALL of the !!”
ECON001
“Teaches clearly, take home exams helped ALOT for test preparation.”
ECO1
“he made me feel stupid asking if i even read the book”
ECON1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and exams, sometimes with cheat sheets, make assessment student-friendly.

Take-Home QuizzesTake-Home ExamsCheat Sheet AllowedParticipation Extra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams that often aid in-class test prep.

Take-Home QuizzesTake-Home ExamsCheat Sheet Allowed
“do ALL of the !!”
ECON001
“ ”
ECO1
“He gave us take home exams that could sometimes be used on the inclass ones. We were also able to use a cheat sheet!”
ECON001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“2 Things you must do in his class... be there and do ALL of the !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews with mostly positive themes and one harsh outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He gives good examples and analogies to help you understand the subject.”

📝 Assessment Style

80/100

“ ”

⚠️ Tone Risk

35/100

“he made me feel stupid asking if i even read the book”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hes funny in his sarcastic ways and
  • flexible and willing to work with the class
  • One of the .L.A.C.

Theme 2

📈 About Work & Grades

  • There is alot of homework but as long as you do it you will be fine

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • he became bitter and unfriendly
  • God forbid if you got up to go use the restroom
  • I was afraid to ask for help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Ten older reviews mostly align on workload and help, with one sharp negative outlier.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON0014 reviews
ECO12 reviews
ECON12 reviews
ECONOMIC0011 review
MICROECONOMICS1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values