AI Rate Professor

English

Michael Tracey

ESL6 · ESL5A · FOCUSONGRAMMA · ESL · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you need ESL writing help and can handle uneven fairness; otherwise pick someone with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed FeedbackShows FavoritismEssay & Grammar FocusInconsistent QualitySparse Reviews
  • Reviews are old, thin, and split between praise for writing knowledge and complaints about favoritism.
  • One student got an A and and grammar; another rated him 1 for disliking disagreement.
  • .
  • Overall experience feels uneven and hard to trust from only four brief comments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student reported an A and moderate difficulty, but sparse grade detail and a hard 5/5 difficulty .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Average difficulty around mid-high with mixed comments ranging from moderate to very hard ESL work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

No review clearly .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Split quality ratings and one strong favoritism complaint make a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

One A is reported, but another student felt favoritism and dislike of disagreement hurt fairness.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Comments give almost no concrete homework load beyond general ESL essay and grammar work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some praise essay and subject knowledge; others give low quality for favoritism and thin engagement.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention essays and grammar but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ESL and grammar courses draw mixed short reviews: some and and dislike of disagreement.

Main concern

Favoritism and thin, dated comments leave grading fairness and .

What students said

“He knows a lot about how to write essays, .”
ESL
“he shows favortism towards some students and does not like student disagree with his opinion.”
ESL5A
“Very good Professor.”
FOCUSONGRAMMA

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he shows favortism towards some students and does not like student disagree with his opinion.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews (2009-2014), highlighting sparse themes in knowledge versus fairness. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Subject Knowledge

70/100

“He knows a lot about how to write essays, .”

⚖️ Fairness Concerns

25/100

“he shows favortism towards some students and does not like student disagree with his opinion.”

👍 Overall Recommendation

45/100

“Very good Professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He knows a lot about how to write essays, .
  • He teaches students "Happy Monday!"
  • Very good Professor.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Fairness

  • he shows favortism towards some students and does not like student disagree with his opinion.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only four brief reviews from 2009-2014 with little detail, no tags, and inconsistent tone.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL1 review
ESL5A1 review
ESL61 review
FOCUSONGRAMMA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1