AI Rate Professor

Information Science

Ken Lin

LIBSCI102 · LIBSC102 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Skip unless you only need an easy online grade and do not care about learning; thin evidence and poor teaching marks.

Best fit · Easy A HunterBoring lecturesLearned nothingEasy A onlineLow engagement
  • Only two sparse reviews exist, both negative on teaching value.
  • Online review calls the class boring but an easy A; .
  • No detail on exams, workload, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

The only grade-related comment is an explicit easy A online; the .

Easy A claim is online only; .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Online difficulty was rated 1 and described as easy; but the comment only says nothing was learned.

Online called easy; in-person difficulty rating conflicts but lacks content detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Both reviews rate quality 1-2 and emphasize boredom or zero learning, so recommendation is effectively none.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Online student reports an easy A; .

Format shift

Leniency signal comes only from the online review.

Workload

Light

70/100

Comments imply low effort but .

Format shift

Workload is inferred from short online and in-person comments only.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students call the class boring and say they learned nothing.

Format shift

Both formats rate teaching poorly with almost no positive detail.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not describe how .

Format shift

No assessment structure mentioned in either format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person student reported learning nothing and gave the lowest quality score.

Main concern

No learning outcomes reported.

What students said

“I didn't learn anything”
LIBSC102

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One online student called the class pretty boring but an easy A.

Main concern

Boring content with little educational value.

What students said

“pretty boring, but easy A”
LIBSCI102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

rules.

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“pretty boring, but easy A”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 sparse reviews (1 online, 1 in-person). Credibility rating: Low.

😴 Teaching Value

25/100

“I didn't learn anything”

🎯 Easy Grade Online

80/100

“pretty boring, but easy A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • pretty boring, but easy A
  • I didn't learn anything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • easy A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short, old reviews with almost no detail or consistency on difficulty make the profile unreliable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LIBSC1021 review
LIBSCI1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values