AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

C Chanmaguthas

CHEM212 · CHEM211 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless and practice tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads From BookSelf-Taught OchemVague ExpectationsInconsistent ExamsGenerous HW Grader
  • Lectures largely restate the textbook with little added teaching value
  • rushed lecture coverage
  • Homework and , but overall experience is widely panned

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible with and practice tests, but teaching does not make grades easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Organic chemistry content is hard and students say they must teach themselves most weekends.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and another says show up to all classes and labs.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is 0% and multiple students call him among the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

HW and labs are described as easy or and exams disappoint.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report constant self-study, labs, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Lectures copy the , and emails are often ignored.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades combine homework, labs, quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person o-chem is textbook-heavy with weak lecturing; success depends on self-study despite .

Main concern

Vague expectations, ignored emails, and .

What students said

“One of . Lectures are power points directly from textbook.”
CHEM212
“he is very vague with his expectations and inconsistent with .”
CHEM211
“You can get an A if you are able to just read & study by yourself and do the practice tests.”
CHEM211

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and , so students rely on self-study and practice tests.

Inconsistent quizzesSame-day material on examsPractice tests useful

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams are seen as inconsistent and sometimes based on material barely taught.

Inconsistent testsSame-day quiz contentPractice tests
“He has taught things the same day he as the quiz/exams.”
CHEM211
“inconsistent with ”
CHEM211
“You can get an A if you are able to just read & study by yourself and do the practice tests.”
CHEM211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want a prof to .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting self-teaching and weak lectures. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“This Prof reads STRAIGHT from the book -his lecture are EXACTLY what is in the book.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“One of . Lectures are power points directly from textbook.”

⚖️

68/100

“he is a rather .”

📚

30/100

“You will teach yourself ochemistry every weekend and still get a B.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Questions responded to by look in your book
  • reads STRAIGHT from the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's not strict and
  • got A's in both
  • You will teach yourself ochemistry every weekend and still get a B

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity

  • very vague with his expectations and inconsistent with
  • E-mails w/ homework questions & request for class status are ignored

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews spanning 2005-2016 mostly agree on weak teaching, with one .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM2113 reviews
CHEM2121 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1