AI Rate Professor

English

M Boretz

ENG270 · ENG103 · ENGLI102 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Prefer her online sections if you want a manageable reading-and-discussion class; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing instructorHeavy reading loadCaring onlineUnclear in personWould take again online
  • Online English students find her caring, fair, and fairly easy with discussions and short papers.
  • Several in-person ENG103 , and hard to pass.
  • Experience depends heavily on format and course section.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Online sections feel fairly easy with short papers, while already strong English.

Online reviews lean easy A; in-person ENG103 reviews describe hard grading and little help.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Reading and writing load is steady but not advanced; difficulty spikes when students need more instructional support.

Online is described as easy and interesting; in-person ENG103 is called very hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and weekly discussions act like required participation.

; in-person policy is not clearly described.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; several in-person students strongly warn others away.

Online reviews are positive recommendations; in-person ENG103 reviews urge avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

and reported A/B grades look reasonable, but in-person students report harsh standards and D risks.

Format shift

Online feels fairer; in-person ENG103 students report .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and 2-3 page papers create a steady but not extreme load.

Format shift

and short papers; in-person complaints focus more on help than volume.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Caring and active online teaching contrasts with and .

Format shift

Online teaching rated much higher than the in-person ENG103 experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Discussions, short papers, quizzes, and exams.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize discussions, papers, and quizzes; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one short positive, several harsh ENG103 reviews , and .

Main concern

Multiple students say and she will not teach or help struggling writers.

What students said

“unhelpful; hard to get good grade; she's expecting you to know perfect English”
ENG103
“ .”
ENG103
“ .”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe fairly easy, interesting reading with weekly discussions, short papers, quizzes, and a .

Main concern

Weekly discussion participation and .

What students said

“Fairly easy class. You should expect to read poems, stories, and plays.”
ENGLI102
“ .”
ENGLI102
“She was an active teacher. I learned a ton. And .”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment emphasizes discussions, short papers, and .

Weekly discussionsShort papers 2-3 pagesQuizzesReading-heavy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and expectations for already-strong English rather than named exam software or proctoring.

Paper-based writingUnclear instructions
“All the as elementary school kids so she understands you, or you'll get a D.”
ENG103
“If you don't understand the texts, too bad because .”
ENG103

Online

Online , and quizzes with no textbook required in at least one section.

Weekly discussionsShort papersQuizzesNo extra credit
“There was 3 discussions you had to participate in every week. There was also a few papers and quizzes.”
ENGLI102
“The papers were nothing more than 2-3 pages.”
ENGLI102
“No , but .”
ENGLI102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fairly easy class. You should expect to read poems, stories, and plays.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (3 online, 5 in person), highlighting the strong format split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She was an active teacher. I learned a ton. And .”

🌐 Online Experience

78/100

“ . .”

🏫 In-Person Warning

20/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“There was 3 discussions you had to participate in every week.”

Theme 1

🌐 About Online Class

  • Fairly easy class
  • Easy and interesting class. Helpful and understanding professor

Theme 2

🏫

  • unhelpful; hard to get good grade

Theme 3

📖

  • Get ready to read
  • The papers were nothing more than 2-3 pages

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews mix online and in-person formats from 2007-2017 with a .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1034 reviews
ENGLI1023 reviews
ENG2701 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values