AI Rate Professor

Science

Jung Kim

PHYSI8412 · PHYSI0000 · PHYSI4285 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a caring teacher and fair exams, but .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful and caringEasy tests when preparedFirst-time teaching riskClear email responderPhysio content expert
  • Most students praise her as extremely helpful and the nicest professor who answers every question.
  • Exams are generally fair and easy if you study; and sloppy slides.
  • course rather than teaching it for the first time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most reviews call tests easy or fair with study; only the .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Two of three students rated difficulty very low; one first-time section felt overloaded with material.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Two glowing recommenders outweigh one negative first-time teaching review.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Easy fair tests and ; and unclear.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Comments focus on studying for .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Praised as nicest most helpful physio teacher, but one first-time course was with bad slides.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Student comments center on exams and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and nicest teacher with easy fair tests, though one first-time class found her with messy exams.

Main concern

First-time course offerings can feel disorganized with .

What students said

“ . .”
PHYSI0000
“Very helpful and understanding professor. Will go out of her way to make sure students has a good grasp of all contents.”
PHYSI8412
“First time teaching class. . To much material given for exams.”
PHYSI4285

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually fair and easy if you study, but a .

Fair examsNeed to studyHard exams in first-time courseMultiple exam versions

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams ; one class used two versions against cheating.

Fair examsEasy testsHard unclear examsTwo exam versions
“easy tests. She went out of her way to answer every question.”
PHYSI0000
“ but you do need to study for it.”
PHYSI8412
“Most of .”
PHYSI4285

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting helpful teaching versus first-time course risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Very helpful and understanding professor. Will go out of her way to make sure students has a good grasp of all contents.”

📝

58/100

“ but you do need to study for it.”

⚠️ First-Time Course Risk

35/100

“First time teaching class. . To much material given for exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . .
  • Will go out of her way to make sure students has a good grasp of all contents.
  • Extremely intelligent knows her physio.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but you do need to study for it.
  • Most of .
  • Powerpoints have many mistakes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three very old 2012 reviews with mixed first-time teaching signal and no grade data.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYSI00001 review
PHYSI42851 review
PHYSI84121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values