AI Rate Professor

English

Erika Szostak

ENG3956 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENG28 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless , and weak out-of-class support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarized reviewsHeavy busyworkUnresponsive to emailAttendance criticalHarsh on grades
  • Early fans call her energetic and the .
  • Later reviews hammer heavy busywork, wrong , and ignored emails.
  • Serious plagiarism accusation dispute and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong students report barely earning A or shock C grades after heavy work.

All evidence is from reviews tagged in person; some bodies mention online sections.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Volume of assignments and for English 101.

All evidence is from reviews tagged in person; some bodies mention online sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple students say attendance and participation are crucial and missing work is unforgiving.

All evidence is from reviews tagged in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

About half urge never again due to stress and support gaps, despite older glowing endorsements.

All evidence is from reviews tagged in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

, and refusal to fix wrong keys dominate later feedback.

Format shift

All evidence is from reviews tagged in person.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Repeated claims of excessive busywork impossible to pair with other classes.

Format shift

All evidence is from reviews tagged in person.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Early classes called energetic and inspiring; later ones call her unresponsive and confusing.

Format shift

All evidence is from reviews tagged in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and participation .

Format shift

All evidence is from reviews tagged in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Marked in-person in data, but several comment bodies describe online ENG101 with , and ; older in-class fans loved energy and help.

Main concern

Workload overload plus unresponsiveness and .

What students said

“BY FAR THE !!!!! ... . Her for many exams are incorrect”
ENG101
“She is so helpful and goes out of her way to help her students. She is the very definition of what a teacher should be!!!!!!!!!!”
ENG28
“Totally absolutely unbelievably unreasonable workload. ... .”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; students stress assignment volume and disputed more than proctoring.

Many assignmentsExam answer key issues reportedParticipation required

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize piles of assignments and .

Heavy assignmentsIncorrect answer keys reportedParticipation must
“Her for many exams are incorrect and she refuses to correct them if ”
ENG101
“She has so many assignments. It is so much busy work.”
ENG101
“ and class participation is a must.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“BY FAR THE WORST PROFESSOR EVER!!!!! I took her course online. and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews tagged in person, highlighting a sharp early-positive versus late-negative split. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Overall Experience

34/100

“ . Too much stress. She is horrible.”

📚 Workload Overload

18/100

“Totally absolutely unbelievably unreasonable workload. This is college and I get it, but this was totally ridiculous.”

❤️ Early Fan Praise

90/100

“ IF YOU WANT TO LEARN. SHE IS THE .”

📧 Support Gaps

25/100

“ . .”

Theme 1

💔 About Negative Experience

  • She sux! if you are a great student
  • The ! She accused me of plagiarism
  • BAD BAD! ... her online class is horrible.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • so many assignments. It is so much busy work
  • often you don't hear about them till after they are due

Theme 3

❤️ About Character When Liked

  • enthusiastic, energetic and wants her students to learn
  • treats you like a person if you act like one
  • allows you to be yourself. No question is a stupid question

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

13 reviews are polarized and old (2007-2011); online experiences appear inside in-person tags, lowering clarity.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1017 reviews
ENG283 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
ENG39561 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values