AI Rate Professor

Political Science

E Piken Nagler

POLSI001 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; reviews describe poor subject knowledge and punishing workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnpreparedHard TestsConfusing LecturesTime-WastingAvoid
  • Both reviews give quality 1 and difficulty 5.
  • Students say he does not know the subject and wastes class time.
  • Homework and tests are described as extremely hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Students say homework and success described.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

Difficulty ratings are maxed and and tests.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Both reviews are harshly negative and call him an idiot who wastes class time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tests and as extremely hard with no leniency mentioned.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

so hard that note-taking and tests feel even harder.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students say he does not know the subject and derails class with off-topic talk.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

and even harder tests as the core burden.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Nearly identical scathing reviews call him uninformed, off-topic, and and tests.

Main concern

Perceived lack of subject knowledge and extremely hard assessments.

What students said

“wow this guy doesn't not anything about the subject. so .”
POLSI001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only state that tests are extremely hard; .

Hard TestsHard Homework

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests are described as harder than the .

Hard Tests
“ so .”
POLSI001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“wow this guy doesn't not anything about the subject. so .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 nearly identical in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Quality

10/100

“wow this guy doesn't not anything about the subject.”

📚 Workload Pain

12/100

“ so .”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“this guy is a idiot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesn't not anything about the subject
  • he just stops and talks about somthinng else that someone brought up to waste time

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so hard
  • taking notes are even harder

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only two near-duplicate reviews from the same day limit reliability despite total consistency.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

POLSI0012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values