AI Rate Professor

History

Deanna Heikkinen

HIST101 · HIST1B · HISTB1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take only if and quizzes; expect and mixed support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed FeedbackSlow GradingWeekly QuizzesStay On TopResponsive When Good
  • Student experiences are split between excellent and awful
  • Weekly quizzes and
  • Communication and return of graded work are inconsistent

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Grades are reachable if you keep up with readings and quizzes, but .

All evidence comes from In person tagged reviews; several comments still describe online class logistics.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is manageable with chapter reading, yet weekly quizzes and .

All evidence comes from In person tagged reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state a , so .

All evidence comes from In person tagged reviews with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Some students call her excellent and , while others call her awful for .

All evidence comes from In person tagged reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

No clear grade curve is described; success seems tied to quiz and .

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person tagged reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly quizzes and but not crushing load.

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person tagged reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Praise for interaction and timely returns sits next to complaints about ignored PMs and .

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person tagged reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Weekly quizzes and difficult finals dominate the .

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person tagged reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person tagged reviews still describe online-style history sections with mixed praise for interaction and sharp criticism for and .

Main concern

Slow or and inconsistent professor responsiveness.

What students said

“This was an excellent class and .”
HISTB1
“SHE WAS AWFUL!!!!!!! Oh, and the ETUDES was a mess too!”
HISTB1
“Just stay on top of assignments and you'll do great.”
HISTB1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect and finals that some students found harder than the textbook alone.

Weekly QuizzesDifficult FinalsSome Questions Outside Book

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Weekly quizzes reward careful reading; book.

Weekly QuizzesDifficult FinalsReading Heavy
“You will need to thoroughly read each chapter if you hope to pass the .”
HISTB1
“The , because she has some questions that aren't covered in the book.”
HISTB1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A+! Take this class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting mixed teaching support and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“This was an excellent class and .”

⚠️ Responsiveness Issues

30/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“The class was fairly easy if your willing to stay on top of the work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • and frequently interacts with the class.
  • I did not get responses to my emails.
  • !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You will need to thoroughly read each chapter if you hope to pass the .
  • The , because she has some questions that aren't covered in the book.
  • Just stay on top of assignments and you'll do great.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews from 2007-2010 with mixed tone, sparse grade data, and limited detail reduce confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HISTB13 reviews
HIST1011 review
HIST1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values