AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Sander Frazier

CD11 · CHID0530 · CHDEV011 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Likely a solid Child Development pick if you attend, read, and , but the single harsh review means results can vary.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyOrganizedProject HeavyScantron ExamsHelpfulPolarizing
  • Two strong reviews praise organization and creative projects
  • One review
  • if you read and attend

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Passing and strong grades look realistic with , and .

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Supportive structure and thorough coverage make the content approachable for education-minded students.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

as a key path to passing, though a hard mandatory policy is not detailed.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most detailed reviews strongly recommend her for education majors despite one flat rejection.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

if and prepare for scantron exams; no free-A claims appear.

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Fun projects in and out of class plus reading for .

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Students highlight organization, interest, helpfulness, and specialty knowledge in child development.

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Creative projects and scantron exams both matter in student descriptions.

Format shift

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person Child Development , and specialty knowledge, with one outright non-recommendation.

Main concern

A minority of students strongly dislike the course experience.

What students said

“Professor Frazier is a FANTASTIC professor!! and helpful and she covers the course materially thoroughly.”
CD11
“ class daily and ask questions if you need help and you'll pass the class.”
CHID0530
“ !”
CHDEV011

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as scantrons based on the book, with attendance and questions helping you pass.

Scantron ExamsRead the BookAttend Class

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and attending class daily.

Scantron ExamsRead the Book
“ class daily and ask questions if you need help and you'll pass the class.”
CHID0530

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Frazier is a FANTASTIC professor!! and helpful and she covers the course materially thoroughly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting organization, projects, and mixed recommendation tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Professor Frazier is a FANTASTIC professor!! and helpful and she covers the course materially thoroughly.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ .”

📝

60/100

“ class daily and ask questions if you need help and you'll pass the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helpful
  • Fun and and out of class.
  • child Development is her specialty, therefore you'll learn a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class daily
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2008-2010 with one extreme negative and two positives keep confidence low.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD111 review
CHDEV0111 review
CHID05301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values