AI Rate Professor

English

Matthew Tittle

ENG1A · 1B · 1A · ENG1B · ENG1C · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you write strongly, document originality, and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderAI Flagging ComplaintsHeavy Writing LoadPolarizing FeedbackEssay Focused
  • Recent online reviews warn he flags student work as AI and gives little recourse.
  • Workload is writing-heavy with frequent due dates and lots of essays.
  • and research prep; newer reviews are much harsher.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and feel uncertain even when drafts go well.

Online AI-flag stories lower .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Content is standard college English, but volume of papers and daily work raises the perceived grind.

Both formats report heavy writing; online adds daily deadlines.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

, though a few in-person sections called it mandatory yet pointless.

Online is mostly optional; in-person reports vary by term.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; glowing writing-skill praise fights recent avoid-at-all-costs warnings.

Recent online reviews drag .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Repeated tough-grader tags and AI or .

Format shift

Online AI enforcement is the strictest signal; in-person is more mixed.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe lots of writing, daily due dates, many papers, and work that feels too much for three units.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Helpful research coaching and humor for some; , and unhelpful for others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Course , and papers rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Same essay-heavy pattern online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fun class energy, while others call lectures off-topic and .

Main concern

and sometimes rude or unhelpful responses.

What students said

“The feedback in this 1A helped me get on track with .”
ENG1A
“HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRRRIBLE. .”
ENG1B
“Too much work for a 3 unit class.”
ENG1C

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews cluster around AI accusations, weak communication, and heavy daily writing; a minority still praise resources and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ .”
ENG1A
“HE FLAGS REAL STUDENT WORK AS AI FOR NO REASON”
ENG1C
“so ”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly papers and writing assignments; friendliness depends on how harshly finals and AI checks are applied.

Essay heavyDraft then final papersAI detection concernsExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize essays and ; little explicit exam-policy detail.

Essay focusedUnclear essay expectationsGroup presentations
“ .”
ENG1A
“The ”
ENG1C

Online

; risk centers on AI flagging of essays and heavy writing deadlines.

AI flagging complaintsEssay finalsExtra credit
“He will give you fair grade of rough drafts and then fail you on your final with out any education or feedback.”
ENG1A
“HE FLAGS REAL STUDENT WORK AS AI FOR NO REASON”
ENG1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . HE FLAGS REAL STUDENT WORK AS AI FOR NO REASON”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🤖

34/100

“ .”

📝 Workload Crush

28/100

“so ”

✍️

48/100

“The feedback in this 1A helped me get on track with .”

🔀 Polarized Reputation

48/100

“Tittle is one of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Funny dude too.
  • HES ARROGANT, HES UNHELPFUL
  • Great class that and easy going.
  • he never really got to any subject matter

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Overall hes just TOUGH.
  • but the essays.
  • He offers a lot of

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • HE'S TERRIBLE AT COMMUNICATING
  • when you emailed him he would only give you a one sentence response.
  • He was really rude when I ask him for help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

18 reviews with strong recent AI-related detail but a sharp split over years make the portrait useful yet not fully settled.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG1A7 reviews
ENG1C5 reviews
1A3 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2