AI Rate Professor

English

Dianne Cervantes

ENGL1A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid until more reviews appear; and unclear online English instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAI Feedback IssuesUnclear AssignmentsInaccurate CommentsLow Quality
  • Single review alleges heavy ChatGPT use for .
  • and non-AI writing still contains typos.
  • Student earned an A- but strongly criticizes teaching quality and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The only student earned an A- but describes poor instruction, so the grade does not prove an easy free A.

All evidence is from one online review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty rating is low, but complaints focus on unclear expectations rather than hard content.

Only online ENGL-1A evidence available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

; no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Quality is rated 1 with harsh criticism of and assignment design.

Recommendation stance inferred from one online review only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Student received an A- despite poor experience, but .

Format shift

Only online grade evidence exists.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Review ; and clarity.

Format shift

Workload details are thin in the single online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Accused of , and typo-filled writing.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is from one online class.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Feedback and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online ENGL-1A review reports ChatGPT-style feedback, partial misquotes, contradictory source comments, and poorly explained work.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Professor uses ChatGPT for . Inaccurate suggestions w/ partial misquotes”
ENGL-1A
“ . Her non-AI writing had typos.”
ENGL-1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

the online review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor uses ChatGPT for . Inaccurate suggestions w/ partial misquotes (one part of a quote was from a book we were reading, the rest was gibberish).”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review only. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️

10/100

“Professor uses ChatGPT for . Inaccurate suggestions w/ partial misquotes”

📝 Assignment Clarity

15/100

“ . Her non-AI writing had typos.”

👎 Overall Quality

12/100

“Commented on outside source I used and cited, saying that I should have used an outside source.”

Theme 1

🤖

  • uses ChatGPT for
  • Inaccurate suggestions w/ partial misquotes
  • non-AI writing had typos

Theme 2

📋 About Assignments

  • contradictory comments on outside sources

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent online review exists, so scores rest on a single detailed but unverified account.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL-1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values